Top White Papers
O'Reilly Conference: An Interview with Simon Phipps, IBM's XML and Java EvangelistMar 12, 2000, 16:48 (2 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Lori Houston)
[ Thanks to S.Ramaswamy for this link. ]
"Even though he lives in England, IBM's Chief XML and Java Evangelist Simon Phipps is at the center of Big Blue's strategizing with cutting-edge technologies. Yet when he's asked to speak--to deliver, for example, the keynote "Why the Web Works" at O'Reilly's upcoming Conference on Java--he usually doesn't limit himself to talking about IBM strategy and products. It's not that he won't discuss the company's Java-Linux initiatives or IBM's relationship with Sun Microsystems. He simply prefers probing larger Internet trends."
"As a preface to his keynote address, O'Reilly asked Mr. Phipps to talk about IBM's late-breaking developments with Java and Sun, and the connections IBM sees between Java, XML, and the Web's future...."
"Houston: Why are Java and Linux so strategically important to IBM?"
"Phipps: Do you remember back in the mid-to-late 1990s when there was a lot of talk about which browser was going to be the king, whether it was going to be Internet Explorer or Netscape? IBM took the position back then that the browser was irrelevant. What we're seeing today is a similar war with operating systems. We see Windows 2000 coming out; we see an attempt to defend Solaris; we see a lot of interest in Linux. IBM's message today is that the operating system wars are irrelevant, too. It's all about the Web."
"The step we've taken in focusing on Linux is more to say, "This is a good operating system, why don't we use it?" rather than about saying, "Let's make an attack in the operating system wars." In the future we'll all look back and wonder what all the fuss was about with Solaris and Windows. In five years most people probably won't know what operating system they're running. They won't care. They won't know which vendor made it, and it won't be an issue anymore than browsers are really an issue today."
0 Talkback[s] (click to add your comment)