Linux.com: Piracy, Marketing, and the GPL Mar 17, 2000, 15 :17 UTC (4 Talkback[s]) (5807 reads) (Other stories by Rob Bos)
"When we think about software 'piracy,' the first thing that comes to mind is
the ability to 'steal' software -- that is, to violate the licensing schema to
distribute software to friends, neighbours, or for profit without the
permission and often at the utter forbidding by the software developer."
"In the free software world, however, this kind of piracy is null and void. ... I refer of course to a recent incident involving the Quake source code. A
young coder, in a laudable but misguided attempt to reduce the copious
cheating that has been going on in that community as a direct result of that
source code release, attempted to violate the terms of the GPL. He
restricted the availability of his modified source to a small group of people."
"John Carmack, in threatening to sue for violating the terms of the GPL,
might just end up giving the GPL the court case that people have been
complaining about for years. But instead of having to contest a large
corporation in the courts, a corporation that might have significant interest
in seeing the GPL weakened, if not invalidated, the GPL might have the
opportunity to fight a battle where it is clearly in the right against someone
clearly in the wrong, with the resources and money on 'our' side for a
change."
