DukeofURL: Linux 2.2 VS. 2.4: Benchmarks, HowTo and More.Jan 23, 2001, 20:11 (10 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Patrick Mullen)
WEBINAR: On-demand webcast
How to Boost Database Development Productivity on Linux, Docker, and Kubernetes with Microsoft SQL Server 2017 REGISTER >
[ Thanks to Patrick Mullen for this link. ]
"With Linux growing in popularity, it's an understatement to say that a lot of people were waiting for Linux 2.4. Scheduled and re-scheduled time and time again, Linux 2.4 was finally born on January 4th, 2001 at 4:01 PM, Pacific Standard Time...."
"While this certainly was a long haul and people were skeptical on whether it would ever really be released, it arrived, and let me tell you -- it was worth it for many users. Over are the days when your ATA-100 motherboard refuses to work because your kernel doesn't support the IDE controller. Long past are the days when your USB and Firewire peripherals sat dormant on your Windows machine (unless you happened to run a distro that hacked in USB support for you). The days are also over when an external package needed to be installed for PCMCIA -- it's supported internally via the kernel, now. The future is here -- and it's Linux."
"This is the first release of Linux that is said to truly stack up against Windows as far as speed and compatibility go. It wasn't too long ago that Linux didn't have much support, but in the last year we've seen many vendors hop on the bandwagon. NVidia, ATI, Abit, Lexmark, 3dfx, and SMC are just a few of the vendors that showed their support in Linux over the last year. Still, many companies need to come around, as many third-party hackers were needed to even spur developments of drivers for Linux. Let's hope we have that kind of continued support in the future."
"Everyone who is ready to jump on the bandwagon should pause for a second and ask -- how well does it perform? Will my hardware be compatible? Will 2.4 break features I enjoyed so much in 2.2? Read on to find out the answers to these questions and much more."
0 Talkback[s] (click to add your comment)