Top White Papers
LinuxPlanet: gnotebook: Assessing What We OweApr 28, 2001, 05:54 (29 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Michael Hall)
"...People more jaded than I will file these stories under "Quixotic folly" and go on about their business, but there's food for thought here."
"Troubled though it is at this point, there's a lot of promise in Eazel's Nautilus. Though it was designed as a conduit to a broader operation centered around providing software services, and despite performance issues reflective of its newness, it was a definite contribution to free software in general. If nothing else, the experience and thoughtfulness that went into its interface design and the body of code it's comprised of have some real value to everybody in the open source community. There's also a good chance that many people took advantage of the handfull of services it did provide, even if it is imperfect."
"That brings us to the question of whether we should support the venture that provided the code in the first place or whether we're better off thanking the company that provided the software for its contribution (Nautilus and all its components are GPL'd and in GNOME's main CVS) and moving on, counting Eazel as an unfortunate victim of hard times that fell just shy of getting an opportunity to prove its business model."
0 Talkback[s] (click to add your comment)