Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions




Arcsight Engineer
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-DC-Washington

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:ComputerWorld: ActiveX in Disguise?
ComputerWorld: ActiveX in Disguise?
Sep 12, 2001, 16 :49 UTC (28 Talkback[s]) (9307 reads)

(Other stories by NICHOLAS PETRELEY)

"Alan pointed out that Microsoft will make .Net development tools that will produce applications that create an unpleasant experience for users who don't subscribe to Passport, the same way its applications produce HTML that's annoying to view in Netscape. Alan also said that Microsoft has already floated a software license that makes it illegal to mix Microsoft tools and libraries with software licensed under the GNU General Public License.

That means you can only combine open-source software with Microsoft libraries if you give Microsoft the right to take what you've contributed for free, make it proprietary and then sell it back to you.

Alan nailed .Net for what it really is. You can call it .Net, HailStorm, Passport or CLI, but all .Net amounts to is warmed-over ActiveX. ActiveX failed to catch on and lock Internet users into Windows, in part because someone was clever enough to demonstrate how easy it was to create an ActiveX-enabled Web page that steals information from your Quicken database if you visit that site."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
ComputerWorld: Debunking Microsoft(Sep 10, 2001)
The Register: MS Hailstorm is no threat - Torvalds(Aug 30, 2001)
CNET/Yahoo!: Microsoft learns from its enemy--Linux (Aug 30, 2001)
ZDNet: Microsoft patents a threat to open source(Aug 28, 2001)
ZDNet/TechRepublic: Will Microsoft Mono-polize open source?(Aug 24, 2001)
O'Reilly Network: Corel's Comeback: What's .NET's Role? (Aug 19, 2001)
IEEE.org: Why Microsoft Smears-and Fears-Open Source [Eric Raymond](Aug 18, 2001)
The Register: Microsoft seeks Linux-bashing .NET evangelist (Aug 17, 2001)
LinuxPlanet: .comment: We're Getting There!(Aug 15, 2001)
Guest Column: Will Open Source Lose the Battle for the Web?(Aug 14, 2001)
ZDNet: Will open source get snagged in .Net? (Aug 08, 2001)
LinuxProgramming: DotGNU and Portable.NET join forces(Aug 01, 2001)
LinuxWorld.com: What Ximian's trying to accomplish with Mono(Jul 29, 2001)
InfoWorld: Microsoft's bait and switch(Jul 28, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
> First, as I pointed out last week, the ...   Blatently false statement   
FUD Buster
Sep 12, 2001, 17:56:04
 
> > First, as I pointed out last week, t ...   Re: Blatently false statement   
Rich W
Sep 12, 2001, 18:09:09
 
By the way, at the Linux world conferenc ...   I agree: .net is just bad java   
Henry Story
Sep 12, 2001, 18:17:23
 
 There is no license agreement in thee w ...   License Shmicense   
Brian Clancey
Sep 12, 2001, 18:26:06
 
Here's a link to the actual specific ...   Re: blatantly false statement   
AJWM
Sep 12, 2001, 18:37:06
 
Anyone ever read the ''white&#39 ...   Ha!   
Joseph Nicholson
Sep 12, 2001, 19:09:43
 
How about an ABM license?  

"This sof ...   A modest proposal   
Passacaglia
Sep 12, 2001, 19:18:26
 
> Java is now way ahead of .net in terms ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
debiandoug
Sep 12, 2001, 19:45:21
 
> Yeah, show the Ximain  team where it i ...   Re: Re: Blatently false statement   
Rufus Polson
Sep 12, 2001, 21:13:36
 
> Here's a link to the actual specif ...   Re: Re: blatantly false statement   
Fud Buster
Sep 13, 2001, 01:15:36
 
> Java is now way ahead of .net in terms ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Fud Buster
Sep 13, 2001, 01:37:51
 
Fud Buster,

You're pooling a lot  ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Rick
Sep 13, 2001, 03:54:18
 
Neither Nick nor Alan claimed to have &# ...   Not convincing.   
Barbara
Sep 13, 2001, 05:00:15
 
> > Java is now way ahead of .net in ter ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Henry Story
Sep 13, 2001, 07:09:44
 
Not sure who FudBuster is, but "official ...   Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Nathan Schultz
Sep 13, 2001, 09:21:12
 
I believe everything they say about supp ...   Microsoft are the good guys now   
Mark Kent
Sep 13, 2001, 11:17:29
 
Personally, I don't see the big deal ...   Personal opinion   
Anil Wang
Sep 13, 2001, 13:25:23
 
> Java's libraries were designed for ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Pascal Abessolo
Sep 13, 2001, 14:09:41
 
What you should have said is: "C# is jus ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Michael Lauzon
Sep 13, 2001, 15:21:17
 
"I wouldn't be surprised if anyone h ...   cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Don
Sep 13, 2001, 16:41:54
 

> C# and .Net are in Beta, including V ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
ndj
Sep 13, 2001, 18:19:45
 
> 
> > C# and .Net are in Beta, includi ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Rick
Sep 13, 2001, 18:49:54
 
Microsoft license restrictions about com ...   antitrust   
csbruce
Sep 13, 2001, 19:51:03
 
Don,

I really hate it went people onl ...   Re: cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Michael Lauzon
Sep 14, 2001, 15:13:27
 
Michael,

Sorry, no offense intended.  ...   Re: Re: cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Don
Sep 14, 2001, 16:43:04
 
 > First, as I pointed out last week, th ...   Re: Blatently false statement   
Who\\'s your handler?
Sep 14, 2001, 17:42:07
 
 I believe everything they say about sup ...   Re: Microsoft are the good guys now   
Jerry L Kreps
Sep 14, 2001, 17:46:06
 
"Microsoft has already floated a softwar ...   This is a monopoly-1 company 1 way to do things   
dc
Sep 21, 2001, 04:17:14
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs