Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3

60 Fantastic Free Android Apps

Ready for Another Linux Tablet? Meet the Rugged Trimble Yuma

How can the layman get involved with free software?

RIM Commits to Open Source BlackBerry 10 Native SDK



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:ComputerWorld: ActiveX in Disguise?
ComputerWorld: ActiveX in Disguise?
Sep 12, 2001, 16 :49 UTC (28 Talkback[s]) (10069 reads)

(Other stories by NICHOLAS PETRELEY)

"Alan pointed out that Microsoft will make .Net development tools that will produce applications that create an unpleasant experience for users who don't subscribe to Passport, the same way its applications produce HTML that's annoying to view in Netscape. Alan also said that Microsoft has already floated a software license that makes it illegal to mix Microsoft tools and libraries with software licensed under the GNU General Public License.

That means you can only combine open-source software with Microsoft libraries if you give Microsoft the right to take what you've contributed for free, make it proprietary and then sell it back to you.

Alan nailed .Net for what it really is. You can call it .Net, HailStorm, Passport or CLI, but all .Net amounts to is warmed-over ActiveX. ActiveX failed to catch on and lock Internet users into Windows, in part because someone was clever enough to demonstrate how easy it was to create an ActiveX-enabled Web page that steals information from your Quicken database if you visit that site."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
ComputerWorld: Debunking Microsoft(Sep 10, 2001)
The Register: MS Hailstorm is no threat - Torvalds(Aug 30, 2001)
CNET/Yahoo!: Microsoft learns from its enemy--Linux (Aug 30, 2001)
ZDNet: Microsoft patents a threat to open source(Aug 28, 2001)
ZDNet/TechRepublic: Will Microsoft Mono-polize open source?(Aug 24, 2001)
O'Reilly Network: Corel's Comeback: What's .NET's Role? (Aug 19, 2001)
IEEE.org: Why Microsoft Smears-and Fears-Open Source [Eric Raymond](Aug 18, 2001)
The Register: Microsoft seeks Linux-bashing .NET evangelist (Aug 17, 2001)
LinuxPlanet: .comment: We're Getting There!(Aug 15, 2001)
Guest Column: Will Open Source Lose the Battle for the Web?(Aug 14, 2001)
ZDNet: Will open source get snagged in .Net? (Aug 08, 2001)
LinuxProgramming: DotGNU and Portable.NET join forces(Aug 01, 2001)
LinuxWorld.com: What Ximian's trying to accomplish with Mono(Jul 29, 2001)
InfoWorld: Microsoft's bait and switch(Jul 28, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
> First, as I pointed out last week, the ...   Blatently false statement   
FUD Buster
Sep 12, 2001, 17:56:04
 
> > First, as I pointed out last week, t ...   Re: Blatently false statement   
Rich W
Sep 12, 2001, 18:09:09
 
By the way, at the Linux world conferenc ...   I agree: .net is just bad java   
Henry Story
Sep 12, 2001, 18:17:23
 
 There is no license agreement in thee w ...   License Shmicense   
Brian Clancey
Sep 12, 2001, 18:26:06
 
Here's a link to the actual specific ...   Re: blatantly false statement   
AJWM
Sep 12, 2001, 18:37:06
 
Anyone ever read the ''white&#39 ...   Ha!   
Joseph Nicholson
Sep 12, 2001, 19:09:43
 
How about an ABM license?  

"This sof ...   A modest proposal   
Passacaglia
Sep 12, 2001, 19:18:26
 
> Java is now way ahead of .net in terms ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
debiandoug
Sep 12, 2001, 19:45:21
 
> Yeah, show the Ximain  team where it i ...   Re: Re: Blatently false statement   
Rufus Polson
Sep 12, 2001, 21:13:36
 
> Here's a link to the actual specif ...   Re: Re: blatantly false statement   
Fud Buster
Sep 13, 2001, 01:15:36
 
> Java is now way ahead of .net in terms ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Fud Buster
Sep 13, 2001, 01:37:51
 
Fud Buster,

You're pooling a lot  ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Rick
Sep 13, 2001, 03:54:18
 
Neither Nick nor Alan claimed to have &# ...   Not convincing.   
Barbara
Sep 13, 2001, 05:00:15
 
> > Java is now way ahead of .net in ter ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Henry Story
Sep 13, 2001, 07:09:44
 
Not sure who FudBuster is, but "official ...   Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Nathan Schultz
Sep 13, 2001, 09:21:12
 
I believe everything they say about supp ...   Microsoft are the good guys now   
Mark Kent
Sep 13, 2001, 11:17:29
 
Personally, I don't see the big deal ...   Personal opinion   
Anil Wang
Sep 13, 2001, 13:25:23
 
> Java's libraries were designed for ...   Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Pascal Abessolo
Sep 13, 2001, 14:09:41
 
What you should have said is: "C# is jus ...   Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Michael Lauzon
Sep 13, 2001, 15:21:17
 
"I wouldn't be surprised if anyone h ...   cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Don
Sep 13, 2001, 16:41:54
 

> C# and .Net are in Beta, including V ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
ndj
Sep 13, 2001, 18:19:45
 
> 
> > C# and .Net are in Beta, includi ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I agree: .net is just bad java   
Rick
Sep 13, 2001, 18:49:54
 
Microsoft license restrictions about com ...   antitrust   
csbruce
Sep 13, 2001, 19:51:03
 
Don,

I really hate it went people onl ...   Re: cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Michael Lauzon
Sep 14, 2001, 15:13:27
 
Michael,

Sorry, no offense intended.  ...   Re: Re: cranky (vs cross) compiling   
Don
Sep 14, 2001, 16:43:04
 
 > First, as I pointed out last week, th ...   Re: Blatently false statement   
Who\\'s your handler?
Sep 14, 2001, 17:42:07
 
 I believe everything they say about sup ...   Re: Microsoft are the good guys now   
Jerry L Kreps
Sep 14, 2001, 17:46:06
 
"Microsoft has already floated a softwar ...   This is a monopoly-1 company 1 way to do things   
dc
Sep 21, 2001, 04:17:14
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP