Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Shedding commercial attitudes towards documentation

Will secret copyright treaty restrict your digital rights?

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12




Technical Specialist II – PC – LAN (AZ)
Next Step Systems
US-AZ-Scottsdale

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Salon.com: A Unified Theory of Software Evolution
Salon.com: A Unified Theory of Software Evolution
Apr 9, 2002, 14 :30 UTC (27 Talkback[s]) (7314 reads)

(Other stories by Sam Williams)

"The pile, a collection of recently published papers investigating the topic of software evolution, a topic Lehman helped inaugurate back in the 1970s, is something of a taunting tribute. Written by professional colleagues at other universities, each paper cites Lehman's original 1969 IBM report documenting the evolutionary characteristics of the mainframe operating system, OS/360, or his later 1985 book 'Program Evolution: Processes of Software Change,' which expands the study to other programs. While the pile's growing size offers proof that Lehman and his ideas are finally catching on, it also documents the growing number of researchers with whom Lehman, a man with dwindling office space and even less in the way of support, must now compete.

"'And to think,' says Lehman, letting out a dry laugh. 'When I first wrote about this topic, nobody took a blind bit of notice.'

"Software evolution, i.e. the process by which programs change shape, adapt to the marketplace and inherit characteristics from preexisting programs, has become a subject of serious academic study in recent years. Partial thanks for this goes to Lehman and other pioneering researchers. Major thanks, however, goes to the increasing strategic value of software itself. As large-scale programs such as Windows and Solaris expand well into the range of 30 to 50 million lines of code, successful project managers have learned to devote as much time to combing the tangles out of legacy code as to adding new code. Simply put, in a decade that saw the average PC microchip performance increase a hundredfold, software's inability to scale at even linear rates has gone from dirty little secret to industry-wide embarrassment..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Earthweb/Aberdeen InSight: Linux Gets a Boost From Standards(Apr 04, 2002)
The Register: Open source a needed outlet for programming pros (Feb 06, 2002)
Wired News: Breakthrough for Penguin-Heads(Feb 01, 2002)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
This is a great article related to the t ...   Contribution : Natural Selection   
Luciano Giordana
Apr 9, 2002, 15:35:44
 
An open source model works because when  ...   This is selection not evolution   
Charlie
Apr 9, 2002, 16:08:39
 
I think a good statement/question in the ...   New and exciting versus old and boring   
tc
Apr 9, 2002, 17:10:00
 
I found it well written and inspiring. A ...   great article!   
none
Apr 9, 2002, 17:23:16
 
Eh, I'll get nitpicky here. This in  ...   Re: This is selection not evolution   
Larry
Apr 9, 2002, 17:50:04
 
> An open source model works because whe ...   Re: This is selection not evolution   
icode
Apr 9, 2002, 18:49:50
 
I agree that software does not evolve, b ...   Computer science != Biology   
JJS
Apr 9, 2002, 19:10:15
 
Rot! There is no adaption as there has b ...   Re: Re: This is selection not evolution   
Fred
Apr 9, 2002, 20:35:55
 
>As far as the "evolution" part of softw ...   Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
Rufus Polson
Apr 9, 2002, 21:29:54
 
> >  It is used too often by people who  ...   Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
Dan Hensley
Apr 9, 2002, 22:54:03
 
No software manager will let a developer ...   Management is the problem   
Tim Dion
Apr 9, 2002, 23:41:05
 
> Rot! There is no adaption as there has ...   Re: Re: Re: This is selection not evolution   
icode
Apr 10, 2002, 00:52:59
 
...Whoa.  Do biologists tell you Basic i ...   Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
tc
Apr 10, 2002, 04:34:05
 
As far as the "evolution" part of softwa ...   Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
Wol
Apr 10, 2002, 07:25:39
 
What has NOT been observed, and what tc  ...   Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
Wol
Apr 10, 2002, 07:40:21
 
Intelligent Design does not seem to me t ...   Re: Re intelligent Design - orthodoxy vs dogma   
Craig Nelson
Apr 10, 2002, 13:53:39
 
> How come I could tell you where it hap ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and bo   
Dan Hensley
Apr 10, 2002, 16:30:12
 
>... Isn't it true though that mules ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old an   
tc
Apr 10, 2002, 17:57:15
 
> Wait a minute here, first what compani ...   Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and boring   
Martin Vermeer
Apr 10, 2002, 21:30:46
 
> > Wait a minute here, first what compa ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and bo   
tc
Apr 10, 2002, 23:01:14
 
> Hasn't it ever amazed you that low ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old and bo   
Dan Hensley
Apr 10, 2002, 23:38:31
 
> Intelligent Design does not seem to me ...   Re: Re: Re intelligent Design - orthodoxy vs dogma   
Dan Hensley
Apr 11, 2002, 00:49:47
 
> I agree that software does not evolve, ...   Re: Computer science != Biology   
Jim R
Apr 11, 2002, 05:37:58
 
> > There is no reason why humans and ba ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus old an   
Martin Vermeer
Apr 11, 2002, 09:36:33
 
> I think if you do some research into I ...   Re: Re: Re: Re intelligent Design - orthodoxy vs d   
Colin Walls
Apr 11, 2002, 15:13:34
 
> >... Isn't it true though that mul ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New and exciting versus ol   
JFM
Apr 12, 2002, 12:17:43
 
If we start getting carried away with th ...   Tigons and Ligers   
Heather
Jan 6, 2005, 02:15:57
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs