Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?

Creating Ebooks with Sigil

Editor's Note: Making Multi-Channel Firewire Music With Linux

Amaya: A Simple, Yet Useful Alternative to Dreamweaver




Virtualization Architect
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-Chelsea

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:PR: SCO Says IBM's Amended Complaint, Based on GPL, is Built on a Shaky Foundation
PR: SCO Says IBM's Amended Complaint, Based on GPL, is Built on a Shaky Foundation
Sep 29, 2003, 15 :27 UTC (50 Talkback[s]) (13589 reads)

The SCO Group, Inc. today made the following announcement:

On Friday, September 26, IBM filed an amendment to its legal complaint against The SCO Group. In this amended complaint IBM asserts that SCO has violated the GNU General Public License (GPL), and based on this violation has then violated certain IBM copyrights. IBM, not SCO, has brought the GPL into the legal controversy between the two companies. SCO believes that the GPL -- created by the Free Software Foundation to supplant current U.S. copyright laws -- is a shaky foundation on which to build a legal case. By contrast, SCO continues to base its legal claims on well-settled United States contract laws and United States copyright laws.

The GPL has never faced a full legal test, and SCO believes that it will not stand up in court. We are confident that SCO will win the legal battle that IBM has now started over the GPL. By so strongly defending the controversial GPL, IBM is also defending a questionable licensing scheme through which it can avoid providing software indemnification for its customers. We continue to urge IBM to provide legal indemnification for its Linux customers.

Related Stories:
Yahoo!/The Wall Street Journal: IBM Files New Claims Against SCO in Linux Case(Sep 26, 2003)
eWeek: Ransom Love, Co-founder of Caldera and SCO, Speaks of Unix, GPL and the Lawsuit(Sep 26, 2003)
The Register: Against SCO's GPL Jihad: One Size Doesn't Fit All(Aug 27, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
SCO has shown open generosity with their ...   pretty generous with their advice   
ac
Sep 29, 2003, 15:42:21
 
what the hell are they talking about urg ...   what?   
andy richter
Sep 29, 2003, 15:52:03
 
I'm so sick of hearing this.. the GP ...   GPL in court..   
Guru
Sep 29, 2003, 15:53:32
 
>"By contrast, SCO continues to base its ...   dead meat lawyering   
blacklight
Sep 29, 2003, 16:03:43
 
The GPL has not been created to `&#9 ...   ``Supplant''?   
Anonymous
Sep 29, 2003, 16:04:14
 
GPL is legal, binding and lawfull. The w ...   Test of GPL   
Greg&Stevens
Sep 29, 2003, 16:28:00
 
What the heck is SCO talking about?  The ...   GPL and Copyright   
Bruce
Sep 29, 2003, 16:33:00
 
SCO believes that the GPL -- created by  ...   T.C.F.K.A.D. aka McBride, Darl   
Martin Leweling
Sep 29, 2003, 16:38:30
 
It's funny how SCO (ex Caldera) has  ...   GPL   
Jacek Piskozub
Sep 29, 2003, 16:40:00
 
"... we continue encouraging IBM to prot ...   Do that... or not... it's the same   
kad
Sep 29, 2003, 16:42:48
 
> By using the word ``supplant&# ...   Re: FSF sues SCO ?   
Gil Bates
Sep 29, 2003, 17:06:06
 
> By using the word ``supplant&# ...   Re: ``Supplant''?   
Cassandra
Sep 29, 2003, 17:22:51
 
persuing such a "shaky" legal course.    ...   SCO should be tickled pink that IBM is ...   
GreyGeek
Sep 29, 2003, 17:29:16
 
Interestingly enough, Microsoft EULAs ar ...   Re: GPL in court..   
C. Whitman
Sep 29, 2003, 17:37:21
 
The GPL needs a good test in court and I ...   The GPL Needs a Good Test   
Matthew C. Tedder
Sep 29, 2003, 17:38:00
 
Perhaps there is an "achillies heel" her ...   One crappy judge   
Someone
Sep 29, 2003, 17:42:23
 
In order to win this case, SCO must expl ...   SCO needs to explain why it agreed with GPL   
Mario Miyojim
Sep 29, 2003, 17:53:56
 
Exactly..you hit the nail on the head.   ...   Re: One crappy judge   
g@
Sep 29, 2003, 18:40:07
 
I think it is funny or pathetic they att ...   SCO is in real trouble   
Dan Clayton
Sep 29, 2003, 18:49:40
 
"... created by the Free Software Founda ...   Raving mad   
Gary Lawrence Murphy
Sep 29, 2003, 18:51:27
 
ROFLIf the best SCO can do to respond to ...   BWA! HAH! HAH!   
F. Love
Sep 29, 2003, 18:54:26
 
> What happens if one crappy or corruput ...   Re: One crappy judge   
Tony OBryan
Sep 29, 2003, 19:22:16
 
What happens if one crappy or corruput j ...   Re: One crappy judge   
I R A Darth Aggie
Sep 29, 2003, 20:03:36
 
The judge has already been assigned to t ...   Re: One crappy judge   
ac
Sep 29, 2003, 20:09:13
 
> Exactly..you hit the nail on the head. ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Johann Gambelputty
Sep 29, 2003, 20:26:42
 
> The GPL has not been created to `& ...   Re: ``Supplant''?   
wb
Sep 29, 2003, 21:08:11
 
SCO's press relases/interviews are p ...   One day even journalists will take notice   
bill
Sep 29, 2003, 21:19:42
 
> Perhaps there is an "achillies heel" h ...   Re: One crappy judge   
Mario Miyojim
Sep 29, 2003, 21:42:21
 
The only way for them to show they are n ...   Re: Re: GPL in court..   
SM
Sep 29, 2003, 21:48:17
 
Tony, your post was very good in general ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge   
C. Whitman
Sep 29, 2003, 22:16:45
 
> This line of reasoning harms proprieta ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Daniel
Sep 29, 2003, 22:58:11
 
> All it takes is ONE judge who is in th ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Daniel
Sep 29, 2003, 23:15:44
 
If GPL is valid, SCO are copyright infri ...   Lose-lose for SCO   
Bojan Smojver
Sep 30, 2003, 02:54:52
 
News:For todayNASDQX up 1.8%DOWIA up ~1% ...   Dollars and cents   
The Mote in Boise's Eye
Sep 30, 2003, 03:45:05
 
> We could single out a few of SCO's ...   Re: One day even journalists will take notice   
Chad Kitching
Sep 30, 2003, 04:26:19
 
Get Outta here... There's better stu ...   Where there's flies, there's...   
GaAsP
Sep 30, 2003, 05:30:46
 
> I think the GPL is not a copyright lic ...   Re: Re: ``Supplant''?   
Anonymous
Sep 30, 2003, 07:55:38
 
 Is it an easy matter to transfer the li ...   Re: One crappy judge   
oberver387
Sep 30, 2003, 08:02:54
 
> In both cases, SCO goes bankrupt as co ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge (chess off-topic:-)   
Marcos
Sep 30, 2003, 08:11:47
 
> Is it an easy matter to transfer the l ...   Re: One crappy judge   
Anonymous
Sep 30, 2003, 08:29:14
 
> If GPL is not valid, will SCO negotiat ...   Re: GPL   
Pyotr Streigel
Sep 30, 2003, 09:51:29
 
> What happens if one crappy or corruput ...   Re: One crappy judge   
Rainer Weikusat
Sep 30, 2003, 11:46:50
 
In order for SCO to prove that the copyr ...   Re: Re: Re: GPL in court..   
C. Whitman
Sep 30, 2003, 14:18:27
 
No wonder they're in such deep troub ...   SCO's taking PR Advice from Gray Davis...   
Nicholas Donovan
Sep 30, 2003, 14:42:44
 
You wrote: Copyright law states that if  ...   Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Alex Berkman
Sep 30, 2003, 18:31:11
 
Thanks for the kind comment.  :)> Deriva ...   Re: Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Tony OBryan
Sep 30, 2003, 18:34:54
 
You wrote:>>Copyright law states that if ...   Re: Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Alex Berkman
Sep 30, 2003, 18:47:03
 
> Silly me, I thought checkmate meant yo ...   Re: Re: Re: One crappy judge (chess off-topic:-)   
Tony OBryan
Sep 30, 2003, 18:47:13
 
You wrote: Thanks for the kind comment.  ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: One crappy judge   
Alex Berkman
Sep 30, 2003, 20:20:01
 
> ROFL> If the best SCO can do to respon ...   Re: BWA! HAH! HAH!   
Ralph
Sep 30, 2003, 21:04:46
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs