Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?

Creating Ebooks with Sigil

Editor's Note: Making Multi-Channel Firewire Music With Linux

Amaya: A Simple, Yet Useful Alternative to Dreamweaver




Virtualization Architect
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-Chelsea

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Open Source Law: The Forkin' Fallacy
Open Source Law: The Forkin' Fallacy
Feb 1, 2005, 01 :00 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (9894 reads)

(Other stories by Brendan Scott)

[ Thanks to Brendan Scott for this link. ]

"One meme which has previously enjoyed some popularity is the idea that Linux is prone to, or likely to, 'fork'--that is, to split into a number of separate, possibly competing, branches. Ironically, this argument is based on Linux's greatest strength--its licensing terms. The argument is that forks can arise because Linux's license at least inhibits, and possibly prevents, forced centralized control of strategic direction of the Linux kernel. Having asserted that the licencing permits the creation of forks the argument continues, by reference to the UNIX Wars of the multiplicity of Linux distributions, that this is a bad thing. In this paper we argue that the licensing regime for Linux is its great strength and that, over the long term, it encourages consolidation. We argue further that the creation of forks under these licensing terms promotes innovation and competition and is therefore a good thing both for Linux and for the economy..."

Complete Story (PDF Document)

Download xpdf

Related Stories:
OSNews: Flame Wars, Forks and Freedom(Jan 25, 2005)
eWeek: Fork in Linux Road?(Apr 06, 2004)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
...and that's the forkin' truth. ...   Linux's forkin' good.....   
F. Love
Feb 1, 2005, 02:33:32
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs