Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions




Virtualization Architect
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-Chelsea

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:LinuxPlanet: Infernal Devices
LinuxPlanet: Infernal Devices
Aug 4, 2005, 19 :00 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (8206 reads)

(Other stories by James Turner)

"One of the most frequently cited difficulties transitioning to Linux (especially on the desktop) is that it can be difficult to find and integrate device drivers for new or obscure hardware. In addition, even when drivers are available, they may involve procedures that still strike terror into the hearts of newbies, such as recompiling the kernel. But is this really necessary? I rang up Linux Kernel guru Andrew Morton to discuss the state of Linux devices drivers in 2005.

"LinuxPlanet: What are the limitations on binary drivers as you move from major release to major release and then inside of the point releases?

"Andrew Morton: Well we can change kernel internal interfaces at any time. And obviously there are also issues with making sure that the kernel itself and the driver were compiled with the same version of GCC and the same kernel configuration options..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
SearchEnterpriseLinux: Kernel Maintainer: Linux 2.6 Delivering on its Promise(May 15, 2004)
Linmagau.org: Andrew Morton - 2.6 Maintainer(Aug 13, 2003)
Computerworld Australia: Morton: The Linux Kernel is No Place for 'Self-Expressive Fancy'(Jul 16, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Isn't Matrox better at supporting Li ...   Why not use Matrox?   
robt
Aug 5, 2005, 01:00:03
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs