B-Eye: Open Source Software and the Myth of Viral Licensing

"Proprietary software vendors sow fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) about free and open source software licenses because those licenses are new and different. More notably, open source software licenses threaten their business modes—and they want their customers to believe that those licenses will somehow 'infect' their organizations. The truth is that open source software licenses will almost always be more beneficial for consumers than proprietary licenses. Furthermore, open source licenses rarely (if ever) impose more terms on software users that are any more onerous than those imposed by proprietary licenses.

"This article is about software licenses, which spell out the rules by which you must play to use the software..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• InfoWorld: Infectious Licensing: Helpful or Hurtful?(Nov 22, 2005)
• ZDNet: Globus Chooses BSD-Style License with Eyes Wide Open(Jul 07, 2005)
• IT Manager's Journal: How to Use Open Source to Your Best Corporate Advantage(Nov 10, 2004)
• LinuxInsider: GPL: Viral Infection or Just Your Imagination?(May 25, 2004)