Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security

How to read a CSV file in Perl?

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:developerWorks: Linux Threading Models Compared: LinuxThreads and NPTL
developerWorks: Linux Threading Models Compared: LinuxThreads and NPTL
Aug 8, 2006, 04 :30 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (5693 reads)

(Other stories by Vikram Shukla)

[ Thanks to IdaAshley for this link. ]

"When Linux was first developed, it did not have real support for threading in the kernel. But it did support processes as schedulable entities through the clone() system call. This call created a copy of the calling process, with the copy sharing the address space of the caller. The LinuxThreads project used this system call to simulate thread support entirely in user space. Unfortunately, this approach had a number of disadvantages, particularly in the areas of signal handling, scheduling, and interprocess synchronization primitives. Moreover, the threading model did not conform to POSIX requirements.

"To improve on LinuxThreads, it was clear that some kernel support and a rewritten threads library would be required. Two competing projects were started to address these requirements. A team including developers from IBM worked on NGPT, or Next-Generation POSIX Threads. Meanwhile, developers at Red Hat were working on the NPTL. NGPT was abandoned in mid-2003, leaving the field to NPTL..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
SearchOpenSource: Panic Time: Handling Those Rare Linux Crashes(Nov 21, 2005)
informIT: The Process Model of Linux Application Development(Jul 12, 2005)
ServerWatch: Real World Open Source: Management and Interoperability(Jul 10, 2005)
developerWorks: Port Windows IPC Apps to Linux, Part 1: Processes and Threads(Apr 25, 2005)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP