Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Linux Tips & Tricks: Converting PDF-s to pictures in Linux

Ultimate Firefox Productivity Tips: For the Geeks.

GoldenDict: A Dictionary Nugget

Would You Like Linux With Your Jello?

Why I Use Linux: Lofton’s Story

Go to Toys 'R Us for your Linux netbook needs

Sun xVM VirtualBox 3.0: Virtual Developer's Delight

Apple Wary of Ogg Theora: No Agreement Yet on HTML5 Video Standard

Freedom is not Free for Countries nor Computer Users

Eyecandy Themes For Ubuntu - Download directly from Synaptic - No More Hassles




Senior Windows Engineer (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Linux: Reviewing the Tickless Kernel for x86-64
Linux: Reviewing the Tickless Kernel for x86-64
Jul 14, 2007, 08 :00 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (8947 reads)

"Included in Andrew Morton's potential 2.6.23 merge list were a series of patches to make the x86-64 architecture tickless. Andi Kleen, the x86-64 maintainer replied, 'I'm sceptical about the dynticks code. It just rips out the x86-64 timing code completely, which needs a lot more review and testing. Probably not .23.' Linus Torvalds agreed, 'we are *not* going to do another 'rip everything out, and replace it with new code' again. Over my dead body. We're going to do this thing gradually, or not at all.' He went on to explain 'the patch-set itself actually looks fine, as far as I'm concerned. But it does seem to have that 'enable everything in one go' problem. I'd much rather see one time source at a time being converted, and enabled then and there, so that when people report problems and do a bisection, if it was HPET that broke, you get the commit that changed HPET...'"

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Linux: Understanding Power Consumption(May 15, 2007)
Linux: 2.6.21 Kernel Released(Apr 26, 2007)
Kernel Comparison: Linux (2.6.20) versus Windows (Vista)(Apr 21, 2007)
Phoronix: The Impact Of A Tickless Kernel(Feb 26, 2007)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP