Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12

Editor's Note: Do It Yourself "Cloud"

Google Chrome OS: First looks, first impressions

Kernel Log: Coming in 2.6.32 (Part 3) - Storage




Systems Implementation Engineer II – Disk-Based Back-Up/Replication/RedHat Linux (PA)
Next Step Systems
US-PA-Philadelphia

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Linux: Relicensing Code
Linux: Relicensing Code
Aug 30, 2007, 15 :45 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (6249 reads)

"In a recent series of patches posted to the Linux Kernel mailing list, it was proposed that some imported Atheros wireless device drivers be re-licensed, some from a dual-BSD/GPL license, others from a modified BSD license, all to a pure GPLv2 license. Christoph Hellwig asked, "is this really a good idea? Most of the reverse-engineering was done by the OpenBSD folks, and it would certainly be helpful to work together with them on new hardware revisions, etc.." Luis Rodriguez suggested that there was no choice, "technically the best we can do is to leave the license as dual licensed, but keep in that technically that means nothing and is just for show, the GPL is what would apply as its derivative work and is the most restrictive license."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Linux Driver Copyright Violation(Aug 29, 2007)
Wireless Software for Linux Cleared of Legal Uncertainty by SFLC(Aug 01, 2007)
Interview: The OpenBSD Foundation's Ken Westerback(Jul 27, 2007)
LWN: SFLC: OpenBSD Atheros Driver is Clean(Nov 15, 2006)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
The only thing restrictive about the GPL ...   restrictive license...   
GH
Aug 30, 2007, 16:47:06
 
MS EULAs are not distribution licenses.  ...   Re: restrictive license...   
Cabal
Aug 30, 2007, 23:04:25
 
> MS EULAs are not distribution licenses ...   Re: Re: restrictive license...   
Rainer Weikusat
Aug 31, 2007, 12:16:30
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs