Read the Fine Print on "Open Source" Software

"Back in the 1980s, when Richard Stallman was the only one talking about the need for 'free software,' no one quite knew what he was talking about. That's not just because people looked askance at someone who said it would be possible to write a version of Unix that could be given away for free, along with all of the compilers, editors, and utilities that a typical Unix installation included. Stallman also managed to confuse people with the term 'free'--he used it as a political statement, saying 'free as in freedom,' or 'free as in 'free speech',' contrasting it with 'free as in 'free beer'.' But no matter how hard he tried, Stallman was faced with the reality that most people thought of 'free software' as programs for which you didn't have to pay money. The fact that Stallman's software was indeed designed to be given away without charge only added to the confusion..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• OpenSolaris Arrives just to Die(May 06, 2008)
• Dual-Licensing is Unfair and Community Debilitating(May 05, 2008)
• Why Product Management is Open Source's Fatal Flaw(May 04, 2008)
• Bringing Microsoft to the Table: Can MS Become an Open Source Contributor?(May 01, 2008)