Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security

How to read a CSV file in Perl?

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level

Commercial Support now available for the open-source NGINX Web server



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Read the Fine Print on "Open Source" Software
Read the Fine Print on "Open Source" Software
May 11, 2008, 04 :00 UTC (2 Talkback[s]) (6537 reads)

(Other stories by Reuven Lerner)

"Back in the 1980s, when Richard Stallman was the only one talking about the need for 'free software,' no one quite knew what he was talking about. That's not just because people looked askance at someone who said it would be possible to write a version of Unix that could be given away for free, along with all of the compilers, editors, and utilities that a typical Unix installation included. Stallman also managed to confuse people with the term 'free'--he used it as a political statement, saying 'free as in freedom,' or 'free as in 'free speech',' contrasting it with 'free as in 'free beer'.' But no matter how hard he tried, Stallman was faced with the reality that most people thought of 'free software' as programs for which you didn't have to pay money. The fact that Stallman's software was indeed designed to be given away without charge only added to the confusion..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
OpenSolaris Arrives just to Die(May 06, 2008)
Dual-Licensing is Unfair and Community Debilitating(May 05, 2008)
Why Product Management is Open Source's Fatal Flaw(May 04, 2008)
Bringing Microsoft to the Table: Can MS Become an Open Source Contributor?(May 01, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
From the article: The fact that Stallman ...   Misconceptions abound   
Frank
May 11, 2008, 19:21:28
 
Here in Oz, we understood what he was sa ...   OZ Understood   
Stomfi
May 12, 2008, 03:59:52
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP