Linux: Drivers Should NOT be Closed Source

"I'll try and address all of the issues that came up in the discussion, and then if those who's comments I have removed for being OT from the previous article want to discuss further, they can on this entry.

"Hardware Manufacturers Need Trade Secretes for their drivers - False, hardware is not sold because the software is good, it's sold because the hardware is good. The loss in effectiveness and quality that a manufacturer will suffer from keeping everything in house will be massive as the amount of possible peer review and reuse of other modular parts is small.

The Musings blog above states that "where some zealots believe that people who make money selling software are somehow evil.": Firstly hardware makers make money selling hardware, not software. Secondly, the GPL has no issues with people making money from selling software, it's concern is with the reciprocal freedom you must grant to all users. There may be some reorganisation that's required in order to make money effectively but none of these issues effect hardware manufacturers."

Related Stories:

• Linux Works Even When Your PC is Committing Suicide(Apr 15, 2009)
• 5 Most important companies to the advancment of enterprise GNU/Linux(Apr 06, 2009)
• The key to Linux's mainstream success(Apr 04, 2009)
• Linux game console ready to ship(Apr 03, 2009)
• Testing Out The Nouveau Driver On Fedora 11(Mar 31, 2009)
• 3D Graphics hardware performance using Free Software drivers (X.Org DRI)(Mar 31, 2009)
• AMD Catalyst 9.3 Brings OpenGL Composite Support(Mar 27, 2009)
• Linux distro Moblin V2 alpha 2 released(Mar 25, 2009)
• Debian and keyboard mapping copyrights(Mar 19, 2009)
• Proprietary Driver for Ubuntu 9.04: Fglrx for X Server 1.6(Mar 19, 2009)
• Converting xorg.conf settings to fdi policy files(Mar 19, 2009)