Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security

How to read a CSV file in Perl?

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Open Source Landmark: Mono Freed at Last?
Open Source Landmark: Mono Freed at Last?
Jul 9, 2009, 01 :33 UTC (11 Talkback[s]) (5279 reads)

(Other stories by Bruce Byfield)

"The move was greeted with excitement by Mono developers and distributors, but others are treating the news with caution and waiting for detailed legal opinions.

"The debate over Mono has been complicated by accusations and irrelevancies on both sides. However, the main issue in the debate has always been the parts of the .NET Framework used by Mono that fall under ECMA standards covered by patents.

"These parts include the form and interpretation of C#, which is covered by ECMA 334 specifications, and the Common Language Infrastructure, which is covered by ECMA 335 specifications.

"Neither parts of .NET not implemented in Mono, such as ADO.NET, ASP.NET and Windows.Forms, nor libraries developed by Mono specifically for GNU/Linux, have ever been affected by these or any other patents, according to Mono's Licensing FAQ. However, the affected parts have been more than enough for sections of the free software community to reject Mono, or at least to treat it cautiously."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Stop piling on Mono already(Jul 08, 2009)
Mono promise is nice, Microsoft. What about Linux?(Jul 07, 2009)
New CAOS report on open source licenses, uses(Jul 07, 2009)
Use Gnome-Do To Control Rhythmbox, Banshee, Exaile and XMMS2(Jul 07, 2009)
Microsoft appears to clarify Mono licensing(Jul 07, 2009)
Miguel: You, the man! - Open letter to Miguel de Icaza(Jul 06, 2009)
Correction regarding the "tomboy / mono in default installation" thingy(Jul 06, 2009)
Are Contentious Debates Derailing FOSS?(Jul 06, 2009)
Identifying and removing Microsoft patented ideas from Linux: A Patent A Day Project(Jul 06, 2009)
Hands off the Gimp(Jul 04, 2009)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
The main reson for using mono would be t ...   Still useless   
anon
Jul 9, 2009, 02:13:42
 
I agree with the previous comment. Using ...   Re: Still useless   
J Story
Jul 9, 2009, 02:53:54
 
My first PC was a Processor Technology S ...   I don't care...   
CD Baric
Jul 9, 2009, 04:16:13
 
> Mono is poison.Indeed, but the real pr ...   Re: Re: Still useless   
Neko Nata
Jul 9, 2009, 04:44:18
 
There were a couple of errors in the art ...   Some issues remain   
Yim
Jul 9, 2009, 05:55:50
 
> But I notice the mono fanboys worshipp ...   Re: Some issues remain -- yes, they do.   
Frank Earl (aka Svartalf)
Jul 9, 2009, 12:42:12
 
I think along the same lines for the mos ...   Re: Re: Some issues remain -- yes, they do.   
Yim
Jul 9, 2009, 19:09:21
 
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/07/09/comm ...   Choose: dagger or sword   
Jose_X
Jul 9, 2009, 19:27:23
 
Nobody has yet explained to me why I sho ...   Why mono?   
Charles Hixson
Jul 9, 2009, 22:28:29
 
Whoa!Will the real Yim please identify t ...   Re: Some issues remain - Real Yim??   
LiMuBai
Jul 10, 2009, 08:45:36
 
> Nobody has yet explained to me why I s ...   Re: Why mono?   
P.Woods
Jul 10, 2009, 20:55:38
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP