Linux RAID Smackdown: Crush RAID 5 with RAID 10

"I'll sum up the basic differences:

"RAID10 provides superior data security and can survive multiple disk failures
RAID10 is fast
RAID10 is considerably faster during recovery— RAID5 performance during a rebuild after replacing a failed disk bogs down as much as 80%, and it can take hours. RAID10 recovery is simple copying.
RAID5 is susceptible to perpetuating parity and other errors"

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• SSD vs. SATA RAID: A Performance Benchmark(Jul 30, 2008)
• The Mess That is Linux Volume Management(Jul 24, 2008)
• Benchmarking Hardware RAID vs. Linux Kernel Software RAID(Jul 15, 2008)
• How To Get Started With Logical Volume Management In Linux(Jun 11, 2008)
• Redundant Array Of Inexpensive Disks (RAID)--Technical Paper(May 29, 2008)
• Manage a Linux RAID 10 Storage Server(Mar 05, 2008)