|
|
|
| Top White Papers
Current Newswire:
Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: New mutt packages availableMay 22, 2000, 18:24 (0 Talkback[s])Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:50 -0400
Red Hat, Inc. Bug Fix Advisory
Synopsis: New mutt packages available
Advisory ID: RHBA-2000:023-02
Issue date: 2000-05-12
Updated on: 2000-05-19
Product: Red Hat Linux
Keywords: mutt /etc/Muttrc
Cross references: N/A
1. Topic: New mutt packages are available that upgrade to the latest stable version and fix bugs present in the mutt packages that shipped with Red Hat Linux 6.2. 2. Relevant releases/architectures: Red Hat Linux 6.2 - i386 alpha sparc 3. Problem description: The mutt packages shipped with Red Hat Linux 6.2 did not read /etc/Muttrc correctly, which could cause strange behavior. The new mutt packages are the latest stable version, 1.2i. There are a couple of minor configuration changes from the 6.2 version: - PGP support has changed slightly. If you are using gpg (as
shipped with Red Hat Linux 6.2), no changes should need to be
made. For more information, see /usr/doc/mutt-1.2i/README.UPGRADE 4. Solution: For each RPM for your particular architecture, run: rpm -Fvh [filename] where filename is the name of the RPM. 5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 9535 - Mutt does not seem to use macros 6. RPMs required: Red Hat Linux 6.2: intel: alpha: sparc: sources: 7. Verification: MD5 sum Package Name 67c0ebacab063076b15c9f8f511d179b 6.2/SRPMS/mutt-1.2i-2.src.rpm 35f661ac717ae784a6cfe648ab515914 6.2/alpha/mutt-1.2i-2.alpha.rpm 5f0937875298ad5d9db1076679268e41 6.2/i386/mutt-1.2i-2.i386.rpm d63950498723c7313926a8d352ef6a31 6.2/sparc/mutt-1.2i-2.sparc.rpmThese packages are GPG signed by Red Hat, Inc. for security. Our key is available at: http://www.redhat.com/corp/contact.html You can verify each package with the following command: If you only wish to verify that each package has not been
corrupted or tampered with, examine only the md5sum with the
following command: 8. References: N/A 0 Talkback[s]
(click to add your comment)
|