Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Would You Like Linux With Your Jello?

Why I Use Linux: Lofton’s Story

Go to Toys 'R Us for your Linux netbook needs

Sun xVM VirtualBox 3.0: Virtual Developer's Delight

Apple Wary of Ogg Theora: No Agreement Yet on HTML5 Video Standard

Freedom is not Free for Countries nor Computer Users

Eyecandy Themes For Ubuntu - Download directly from Synaptic - No More Hassles

Sifting Through Billions and Billions of Bytes

Miro 2.0 - Watch TV Podcasts and Videos in HD

Hands off the Gimp




Senior Windows Engineer (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:osOpinion: Abandoned Intellectual Property
osOpinion: Abandoned Intellectual Property
Oct 23, 2000, 06 :45 UTC (25 Talkback[s]) (3349 reads)

(Other stories by Susan Aker)

[ Thanks to Kelly McNeill for this link. ]

"Most states have laws governing what is to be done with property that has been abandoned. In one state the amount of time before something is considered abandoned ranges from a mere 2 years up to 15 years. After that maximum -- depending on the type of property -- the property can be put up for auction, absorbed by the holder of the property, or possibly revert to the state, again depending on the property in question. The laws vary between states, but the principle is there. Property that is not claimed after a reasonable amount of time ceases to belong to the owner."

"Think of how this might apply to intellectual property. Copyright law allows an inordinate amount of time before works revert to the public domain -- author's life plus 70 years, and 95 years on corporate copyright. But, what if the owner of this property had to make sure it was kept available in order to keep the copyright? Any work that has been out of print for more than 15 years probably isn't going to earn its owner anything more anyway. What if these works automatically reverted to the public domain? Couldn't this be a compromise between the entertainment industry and the public? Either the work must be kept available for purchase or else it is available for free, but it is always available."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
NY Times: Copyright Extension Stifles Creativity, Lessig Tells Court(Oct 06, 2000)
Boston Globe: Copyright Should Be Balanced(Oct 05, 2000)
LA Times: Whose Art Is It, Anyway?(Oct 01, 2000)
osOpinion: What Every American Should Know About Copyright(Sep 29, 2000)
SJ Mercury News: Digital Copyright Act comes back to haunt consumers(Aug 29, 2000)
NY Times: Whose Intellectual Property Is It, Anyway? The Open Source War(Aug 24, 2000)
Motley Fool: Intellectual Property Is an Oxymoron(Aug 20, 2000)
LinuxPlanet: Stallman/Stanco: A Dialogue on Copyright Law and Free/Open Source Software (Part 9)(Jul 25, 2000)
Brian Martin: Against intellectual property(Jul 25, 2000)
NY Times: The Concept of Copyright Fights for Internet Survival(May 11, 2000)
Arne Flones -- The Digital Millenium Copyright Act: A Corporate Bully Bludgeon(Jan 25, 2000)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
This is the best solution I've heard ...   Sounds perfect   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 07:38:58
 
You don't normally find to many good ...   Good Idea   
Steve Kirkup
Oct 23, 2000, 07:46:29
 
... but only for trademarks: if they are ...   We already have this in a way...   
Alain
Oct 23, 2000, 08:28:47
 
You're on a much more fruitful track ...   The trouble is who publishes   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Oct 23, 2000, 11:02:45
 
Actually, states do require that you mai ...   Re: The trouble is who publishes   
GemFire
Oct 23, 2000, 12:27:22
 
> Actually, states do require that you m ...   Re: Re: The trouble is who publishes   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Oct 23, 2000, 12:47:32
 
This amounts to authors being terminally ...   Bad idea   
David Kastrup
Oct 23, 2000, 13:52:17
 
Real property where the taxes aren't ...   Abandoned   
Larry
Oct 23, 2000, 14:01:31
 
ownership of a language,

dictates tha ...   language   
ace
Oct 23, 2000, 15:25:33
 
> This amounts to authors being terminal ...   Re: Bad idea   
GemFire
Oct 23, 2000, 16:12:34
 
> The author of the article is not sayin ...   Re: Re: Bad idea   
Anil Wang
Oct 23, 2000, 17:28:58
 
 Actually, states do require that you ma ...   There are many different kinds of property   
Hal Duston
Oct 23, 2000, 17:51:01
 
Another problem with taxing IP is determ ...   Re: Re: Re: Bad idea   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Oct 23, 2000, 17:54:06
 
>Should we penalize an author because pu ...   Re: Re: The trouble is who publishes   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 18:15:51
 
I don't see how the Plauger example  ...   Re: Re: Bad idea   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 18:33:42
 
I think this argument is getting off tra ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Bad idea   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 18:39:33
 
> You'd have to be a real -DELETED-  ...   Re: Re: Re: The trouble is who publishes   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Oct 23, 2000, 18:46:19
 
> That wouldn't do anybody any good. ...   Re: Re: Re: Bad idea   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Oct 23, 2000, 18:48:17
 
It has nothing to do with whether or not ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: The trouble is who publishes   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 19:26:31
 
> > That wouldn't do anybody any goo ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Bad idea   
Michael
Oct 23, 2000, 19:34:04
 
If I own an idea and the government' ...   WHY compromise?   
IP holder
Oct 23, 2000, 20:18:04
 
This is one of the strangest things that ...   Publishers hold copyright, not authors!   
james
Oct 23, 2000, 20:53:47
 
> This is one of the strangest things th ...   Re: Publishers hold copyright, not authors!   
Martin
Oct 23, 2000, 21:02:20
 
This article draws upon a bad practice t ...   Bad Analogy   
Llywrch
Oct 23, 2000, 21:26:06
 
Frequently what would happen with publis ...   Re: Bad Analogy   
Anthony Youngman
Oct 24, 2000, 12:53:37
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP