LinuxMedNews: Stallman Replies to VistA Licensing Issues
Nov 21, 2000, 08:35 (3 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Richard Stallman)
[ Thanks to Saint
for this link. ]
"I would like to respond to the main question in the article and
also correct a couple of mistakes in the article." "I am not a
lawyer, but I have spoken extensively with lawyers about copyright
questions. Presuming that the VistA software is in the public
domain, if you combine it with a GPL-covered program you must
release the combination *as a whole* under the GPL. Using the VistA
code in this way is allowed because public domain status permits
practically anything."
"However, the specific code that was in the public domain
remains in the public domain. In other words, the fact that person
A released the VistA code in a GPL-covered combination does not
stop person B from using the VistA code in some other way."
Complete
Story
Related Stories:
- LinuxMedNews: Possible VistA Licensing Controversy?(Nov 09, 2000)
- LinuxPR: Sanchez Offers GT.M Database as Open Source Freeware to GNU/Linux Users(Nov 07, 2000)
- NewsForge: Open letter from Richard M. Stallman on NewsForge licensing story(Oct 27, 2000)
- ComputerWorld: FTC to study software-licensing practices(Oct 23, 2000)
- British Medical Journal: Medical Software's Free Future(Oct 20, 2000)
- NewsForge: The real difference between Linux and freeBSD - a licensing primer(Oct 18, 2000)
- LinuxMedNews: Medical 'Fear of Forking'(Oct 18, 2000)
- LinuxMedNews: X-Med Offers Linux Medical Office Software(Oct 14, 2000)
- LinuxWorld: A public discussion of open source licensing(Sep 22, 2000)
- ZDNet: Know your rights (regarding open source software) [licensing quick guide](Sep 20, 2000)
- LinuxMedNews: Open Source Medical Project List Reaches 28(Sep 04, 2000)
- LinuxProgramming: The Open Compatibility License 1.0(Aug 18, 2000)
- VNU Net: The net shakes up software licensing(Jul 11, 2000)
- LinuxProgramming: Looking at the General Public License and Open-Source Licenses(Jul 10, 2000)
- Librenix: The BSD License & the GPL: Why we need both(Jun 12, 2000)
- Linux Journal: Software Licenses(Jun 03, 2000)
