Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools

Android Ice Cream Sandwich ported to x86 tablets, netbooks and notebooks

SECURITY: Google Chrome 17 Improves Security

How to read a CSV file in Perl?

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level

Commercial Support now available for the open-source NGINX Web server

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:New Zealand PC World: XP vs Mac vs Linux
New Zealand PC World: XP vs Mac vs Linux
Nov 5, 2001, 11 :01 UTC (59 Talkback[s]) (13758 reads)

(Other stories by Juha Saarinen)

[ Thanks to William B. Greenwood Jr. for this link. ]

"Microsoft's overhauled desk-top OS, Windows XP, has now been unleashed on the world. It's big and requires plenty of system resources ? it does run in 128MB, but only really becomes enjoyable with 256MB, a fast PIII/P4/Athlon CPU and a snappy graphics accelerator. On the other hand, there's no denying Windows XP is a very good general-purpose operating system. It's stable, fast, supports just about every kind of new hardware there is, and is backed up by mountains of Win32 software. But how does it compare to a couple of the rivals?

...It doesn't come out on top in every category, but you can't beat it as a general-purpose desktop OS. It's solid, it's fast, and does everything anyone could reasonably ask of it. Well, on new-ish hardware at least. For the anything-but-Microsoft crowd that's willing to put in some elbow grease to get things to work, Linux 2.4 with KDE 2 won't disappoint. They might have to boot into Windows to play the latest and greatest 3D games, though. Mac users can now boast that they, too, have a modern multi-user OS with pre-emptive multitasking and virtual memory handling. They will likely keep the copy of Mac OS 9 that doesn't have any of these qualities, though, until the software support situation for OS X improves."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
WIRED: Windows XP: EXtra Proprietary (Red Hat's Michael Tiemann says "Boycott the Monopolist")(Nov 01, 2001)
The Register: Win-XP vs Red Hat 7.2 (Oct 30, 2001)
NZ PC World: Learning to love the penguin (I used nothing but Linux for a month. Cold turkey.)(Oct 08, 2001)
NewsForge: Windows developers, it's time to switch to Linux(Sep 26, 2001)
ZDNet: WinXP: an OS for Linux lovers (Sep 07, 2001)
Windows XP Launch Day Roundup(Aug 24, 2001)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
"They might have to boot into Windows to ...   Games ?   
WillTell
Nov 5, 2001, 11:51:58
 
The article was a little lightweight but ...   lightweight but all good stuff   
Andrew Cope
Nov 5, 2001, 12:07:48
 
I wonder what apps this guys is referrin ...   what apps   
Darrin Mison
Nov 5, 2001, 12:10:07
 
Incredible. The performance comparison i ...   very shellow comparison   
tony s
Nov 5, 2001, 12:38:45
 
So little, in fact, as to be almost invi ...   Little elbow grease is right   
Jerry
Nov 5, 2001, 12:52:10
 
His performance comparison is a bit stra ...   performance?   
MacroRodent
Nov 5, 2001, 12:54:39
 
128MB minimum to run it! I wonder what t ...   Bloatware   
Colin Walls
Nov 5, 2001, 12:57:45
 
>On the other hand, there's no denyi ...   listen   
Peter Sheldon
Nov 5, 2001, 13:18:21
 
Beaten in three rounds, tied in one and  ...   WTF?   
Myddrin
Nov 5, 2001, 13:43:31
 
INSTALLATION:
3 Mac OS X
2 Windows XP
 ...   How did XP win?   
Jimmy the Geek
Nov 5, 2001, 13:43:39
 
I hate how they refer to anyone that doe ...   Anything but MS   
Lee Graba
Nov 5, 2001, 13:49:22
 
Its nice to see a biased article about d ...   Wow,   
Sancar Saran
Nov 5, 2001, 14:05:47
 
> For the anything-but-Microsoft crowd t ...   not "anything but microsoft"   
steve
Nov 5, 2001, 14:20:26
 
I wonder how much money M$ paid this guy ...   Wonder How Much M$ Paid This Guy..?!   
Michael Lauzon
Nov 5, 2001, 14:22:42
 
I don't know why Linux-PowerPC is no ...   It's not interesting   
junfrey
Nov 5, 2001, 14:51:26
 
> ...On the other hand, there's no d ...   Not so easy   
James E. LaBarre
Nov 5, 2001, 14:57:32
 
Didn't Anandtech (or tomshardware) d ...   fast??   
tonyl
Nov 5, 2001, 15:04:00
 
What the hell is that?  Every report I&# ...   XP wins the performance category!?!?   
Brian
Nov 5, 2001, 15:11:36
 
Well Linux / KDE has some high marks reg ...   Speed it up!   
Richard Masc
Nov 5, 2001, 15:16:00
 
This is a fair review, and although Linu ...   a fair review   
Casey Perkins
Nov 5, 2001, 15:37:07
 
What makes it so utterly useless is that ...   Some silly mistakes.   
StarTux
Nov 5, 2001, 16:32:09
 
This the AnandTech performance compariso ...   XP performance   
owenmw
Nov 5, 2001, 16:42:23
 
I wonder what all XP preloads at boot ti ...   performace   
hmm
Nov 5, 2001, 16:50:43
 
A few thing's Linux has over the res ...   OpenSource   
usr/root
Nov 5, 2001, 16:52:12
 
The KDE version this guy talks about is  ...   Why write an aritcle on old versions??   
non-poster
Nov 5, 2001, 16:53:29
 
 I wonder what all XP preloads at boot t ...   Re: performace   
Myddrin
Nov 5, 2001, 16:57:54
 
Flame him all you want, but I can't  ...   One very big deal here...   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Nov 5, 2001, 17:01:02
 
Guys, The revies is best summed up by th ...   Predictable response from Open Source Advocates   
Senkwe Chanda
Nov 5, 2001, 17:08:59
 
> I wonder what all XP preloads at boot  ...   Re: performace   
tc
Nov 5, 2001, 17:48:48
 
Windows is Windows "Fisher - Price" . Ve ...   Windows FP   
Leander
Nov 5, 2001, 17:59:44
 
This has been pointed out before, but it ...   It should be said.   
penguano
Nov 5, 2001, 18:08:29
 
This is a Windows rag that is INCLUDING  ...   DESKTOP!!!   
phil
Nov 5, 2001, 18:46:14
 
Note on Linux: Initially configuring sys ...   Re: Re: performance   
CLU
Nov 5, 2001, 19:15:36
 
Senkwe,
	Just out of morbid curiosity,  ...   Re: Predictable response from Open Source Advocate   
a.c.
Nov 5, 2001, 19:19:39
 
Jerry, did you have to do anything speci ...   Re: Little elbow grease is right   
Paul
Nov 5, 2001, 19:24:36
 

...

> The way I see it, there is no ...   Re: Predictable response from Open Source Advocate   
Paai
Nov 5, 2001, 19:30:52
 
> Normally booting times on my machines  ...   Re: Re: Re: performance   
tc
Nov 5, 2001, 19:43:11
 
During the period when Win2000 was in th ...   XP vs. Linux   
Silviu
Nov 5, 2001, 20:53:33
 
 During the period when Win2000 was in t ...   Re: XP vs. Linux   
Myddrin
Nov 5, 2001, 21:29:16
 
 Guys, The revies is best summed up by t ...   Re: Predictable response from Open Source Advocate   
Myddrin
Nov 5, 2001, 21:36:01
 
> Linux is a fast OS, and I hope now tha ...   Who? Re: Speed it up!   
Marco Krohn
Nov 5, 2001, 21:54:20
 
> Well, netcraft lets us look at the upt ...   Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
tc
Nov 5, 2001, 22:14:15
 
> >On the other hand, there's no den ...   Re: listen   
JEDIDIAH
Nov 5, 2001, 22:21:58
 
> > For the anything-but-Microsoft crowd ...   Re: not   
JEDIDIAH
Nov 5, 2001, 22:27:46
 
> This has been pointed out before, but  ...   Re: It should be said.   
JEDIDIAH
Nov 5, 2001, 22:39:17
 
I emailed the author or this story, and  ...   This Was An Old Story...!   
Michael Lauzon
Nov 5, 2001, 22:57:31
 
> Well, netcraft lets us look at the upt ...   Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
blah
Nov 5, 2001, 23:37:24
 
> > Sure you can: run a disk benchmark ( ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: performance   
Rufus Polson
Nov 6, 2001, 00:22:44
 
Don't even talk to me about SuSE 7.3 ...   Re;Little Elbow Grease is right   
Stone Wood
Nov 6, 2001, 03:57:34
 
It's a lot faster than XP on my box  ...   Re: Speed it up!   
Simeon H. Thomas
Nov 6, 2001, 04:51:04
 
> Senkwe,
> 	Just out of morbid curiosi ...   Re: Re: Predictable response from Open Source Advo   
Senkwe Chanda
Nov 6, 2001, 06:40:38
 
Well, a beta KDE probably has as much &# ...   Debug Code   
David Acklam
Nov 6, 2001, 07:32:35
 
I would assume Linux web servers need pe ...   Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
tonyl
Nov 6, 2001, 07:55:22
 
The donkey that rolls himself on the riv ...   And the winner is ... :*)   
R.L.
Nov 6, 2001, 08:49:27
 
This really shows everyithing:

A Linu ...   The importance of boot times   
xxx
Nov 6, 2001, 12:47:39
 
 I don't think "uptime" numbers are  ...   Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
Myddrin
Nov 6, 2001, 13:55:12
 
 Utter rubbish. I have never seen X take ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
Myddrin
Nov 6, 2001, 14:28:06
 
> but X still crashes and it takes a min ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
tc
Nov 6, 2001, 15:32:43
 
I am not sure what your process is, but  ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: XP vs. Linux   
Myddrin
Nov 6, 2001, 16:44:48
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP