Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Contribute
Contribute
Link to Us
Linux Jobs


Top White Papers

More on LinuxToday


Linus Torvalds: Linux Needs New Leadership

Apr 01, 2002, 16:00 (97 Talkback[s])
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 00:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds 
Subject: Linux needs new leadership.
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Kernel Mailing List 

Fellow hackers,

For some time I have felt unappreciated by some members of
the Linux community. Far too many of you like to whine and
cry, saying "My patches aren't being accepted by Linus, but
they are by Alan or Michael!" It seems that some of you are
too stupid to follow the simple instructions that I have
made clear on more than one occasion. This, combined with
the fact that today is my last day at Transmeta, has
prompted me to consider rediscovering that balance I had in
my life before you all took my hobby and made it into a mass
movement. I have not decided who should take over
maintenance of the kernel myself, for I believe that this
decision should be made in a quasi-democratic fashion. While
democracy has not worked well with this group of people
before, I am willing to give it one last chance.

However, I do have some opinions on who should succeed me as
leader of kernel development. I will provide my opinions
below as I am entitled to do so. Below is an alphabetical
list of my nominations. I include a brief explanation of why
I nominated them and any concerns I may have. You all should
do the same for your nominations.

Alan Cox: Alan has done a spectacular job of maintaining the 2.2 branch
  ever since I embarked on the development branch. He would have been an
  automatic choice for this job, except for his childish refusal to
  travel to the US, where all the real kernel hackers hang out.
  Marcello has proven to me, however, that you do not need to live
  in a technology-rich country such as the US to be a leader of
  kernel development.

Matt Dillon: Whenever someone moans about the 2.4 VM fiasco,
  I think to myself, "I wish Matt hadn't left the Linux kernel
  development for FreeBSD!" I believe that if Matt were to be chosen
  as leader, we would have had a sane and working VM on par with
  FreeBSD's months ago. While he has little leadership experience, he
  is a member of FreeBSD-core, a position which certainly demands
  respect.

Eric S. Raymond: Being leader of kernel development involves
  fielding a significant amount of media attention. ESR has shown
  on many occasions that he can talk shit and still sound just as
  convincing as anyone on this list, all the time being completely
  oblivious to any contrasting viewpoints. While his
  kernel-configuration-adventure-game contribution to Linux just
  screams out "worthless bloat", I must admit to having enjoyed
  many a lonely night playing the game. If he could lay a similar
  interface over gdb, I'm sure that more kernel hackers would
  actually debug their work before submitting it.

Richard M. Stallman: RMS has an exceptional track record in the
  open-source field, being largely responsible for my favorite text
  editor, compiler, and debugger. No other open-source hacker has
  come as close as he has to replicating the integration available
  with Microsoft Visual C++ 6 years ago. I fully endorse him as a
  candidate, assuming he's willing to drop his puerile "GNU/Linux"
  ego stroking.

Theo de Raadt: Theo is an exceptional candidate. Not only is he a
  more than adequate hacker; he attracts exactly the type of people
  to OpenBSD that he wants, and will jettison those who are not up to
  the task. While purging out all the less-than-adequate hackers
  in the Linux project will inevitably attract negative publicity
  from Slashdot and other "community" sites where these feeble hackers
  hang out, it will no doubt strengthen Linux in the future. Just
  look at what Theo's strong leadership has done for OpenBSD! He
  turned around the worthless "research project" that was NetBSD and
  made it an enterprise-class firewall system. I can only imagine
  the effect his Midas touch could have on the Linux kernel.

You have until the end of April 1, 23:59 Pacific Time to
submit your nominations to the list. The most nominated
person will become the leader of kernel development. I will
examine the list of nominations and, assuming that the
winner wants the job, I will hand full control over to them.
I know that this is short notice, but knowing how
obsessively most of you check your inboxes, I figure you
should have more than adequate time to submit your
recommendations. The decision will be final and no
discussion will be considered after it has been made, so
choose carefully.

Thank you.

                Linus
-