Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Would You Like Linux With Your Jello?

Why I Use Linux: Lofton’s Story

Go to Toys 'R Us for your Linux netbook needs

Sun xVM VirtualBox 3.0: Virtual Developer's Delight

Apple Wary of Ogg Theora: No Agreement Yet on HTML5 Video Standard

Freedom is not Free for Countries nor Computer Users

Eyecandy Themes For Ubuntu - Download directly from Synaptic - No More Hassles

Sifting Through Billions and Billions of Bytes

Miro 2.0 - Watch TV Podcasts and Videos in HD

Hands off the Gimp




Senior Windows Engineer (NC)
Next Step Systems
US-NC-Charlotte

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Big Apple Considers Taking Bite from Open Source
Big Apple Considers Taking Bite from Open Source
Apr 30, 2003, 20 :30 UTC (9 Talkback[s]) (9764 reads)

(Other stories by Brian Proffitt)

By Brian Proffitt
Managing Editor

While Oregon, Texas, and Oklahoma hash out their policies on open-source software procurement, the City of New York is quietly progressing on its own fact-finding mission on the advantages and disadvantages of open source.

Yesterday morning, the Select Committee on Technology in Government for the New York City Council led a meeting on "Oversight - An Examination of Municipal Policies on Open Source Software Procurement." The meeting, chaired by New York City Councilwoman Gale Brewer, sought to address the question on what, if any, legislation might be needed regarding the purchase of open-source software by the city.

No legislation has yet to come up regarding this issue, and Council staff members were quick to point out that "there is still a lot of fact finding to do." But the meeting did fall into a mirror of the debates currently going on in the Oregon State House regarding that state's proposed open-source legislation. The NYC debates, however, were described as "polarizing" by participants, but not rancorous.

The proposed legislation in Oregon would, if passed, stipulate that any software procurement process in that state would also have to include bids from open-source software projects. Brewer's committee is taking the first steps towards exploring whether such an option would be feasible for New York City.

If the goal of the meeting was fact finding, that goal was certainly reached, according one of the private citizens who helped the Committee organize the event. Bruce Bernstein, President of the New York Software Industry Association, said that the debate in the meeting drew down to the two sides that are present within his own organization. NYSIA, Bernstein said, considers itself netral in this debate, becuse among its membership there are pro-open source and pro-proprietary camps.

NYSIA assisted the Committee in gathering particpiants for Tuesday's meeting. "We thought it was good that all of these issues were aired," Bernstein said.

According to Bernstein, there were witnesses at the meeting who testified both for and against open source software legislation, and many of the presenters were very articulate and very persuasive regarding their views.

Among the participants at the meeting was Aron Trauring, CEO of Zoteca, a Manhattan-based IT business. Trauring said that he wanted to make three points to the Committee during his testimony.

First, he wanted to address the TCO arguments that are currently being presented by Microsoft that indicate that total cost of ownership for Microsoft products might be lower than using Linux products. In his opinion, TCO differencesmay indeed tilt in that direction sometimes, but only because of the lack of knowledge on the part of a company's IT staff on open-source products. If their knowledge of open source is up to date, then such concerns are rendered null.

Secondly, Trauring pointed out the advantages of using open-source software from a jobs persepctive. Currently, large consultant firms are being squeezed between customer demand and the rising costs of licenses. Often times, this may force the firm to seek labor in lower-cost overseas arenas.

While Trauring emphasized that there is nothing inherently wrong with using overseas contractors, any time a project is managed remotely there is a greater danger of slippage in overall product quality. By using open-source software, licensing fees are removed or greatly reduced, allowing firms to channel resources into local employees.

Finally, Trauring argued against vendor lock-in, using a recent example of an IT administrator of a New York City hospital who needed to extract data from an existing database. Unfortunately, due to the conditions of the procurement contract, the administrator could only get to the data by using the original vendor that created and sold the hospital the software.

This anecdote relates, Trauring emphasized, the growing problem of increasing vendor lock-in that could burden the city with even more costs down the road.

And there is a lot of money at stake here. The city's IT budget is around $750 million, a big pie for any software vendor to want a piece of.

But some opponents to these ideas are resistant to let any form of software, open, closed, or otherwise have a leg up on the rest of the software field.

Such was the case made by Andrew Brust, President of Progressive System Consulting, Inc, also in Manhattan. In his view, Brust does not believe that there should be any added legislation to the procurement process.

Progressive, Brust pointed out in the interests of disclosure, is a consultancy that uses Microsoft tools and products to get its projects done. But in his testimony before the committee, Brust was emphatically not anti-open source.

Brust emphasized "IT professionals should have a free hand in getting the software they need." Additional legislation is simply not needed. IT professionals' knowledge and market forces should be what drives procurement decisions, he believes.

Brust, who has worked in the city's IT department before, knows full well that the procurement process is already a cumbersome effort, and he doubts that very little has changed in the 15 years since he left the city for the private sector.

"There are unintended consequences to any well-meaning legislation," Brust said. An attitude shared by the representative of the city's Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications (DoITT).

Roy Bergman, a Deputy Commissioner of DoITT, testifed to the comittee that New York does not need more legislation in this area. Already, Bergman told the Committee, the department has already decided to standardize on open-source software for some projects, so further legislation was simply not needed.

Brust agreed with this assessment, adding that there are no restrictions on procuring open-source software now in New York, nor should there ever be.

Related Stories:
mwvlug.org: HB 2892: A Bill That Just Won't Go Away(Apr 22, 2003)
osOpinion: Legislating Open Source(Apr 22, 2003)
The Oregonian: Stiff Opposition Derails Open-Source Measure(Apr 18, 2003)
ITBusiness.ca: The Debate: Open Source(Apr 16, 2003)
NewsForge: Affirmative Action for Open Source(Apr 15, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Steve Ballmer is getting ready for yet-a ...   Steve is on his way...   
Ernest Pecounis
Apr 30, 2003, 20:48:35
 
Brust is right, developers should be fre ...   The legislation should be about file formats   
Rodd Clarkson
Apr 30, 2003, 21:58:25
 
I live in Oklahoma.  I wonder why I' ...   Oklahoma, huh?   
Jason Lee
Apr 30, 2003, 22:02:06
 
> I live in Oklahoma.  I wonder why I&#3 ...   Re: Oklahoma, huh?   
Brian Proffitt
Apr 30, 2003, 22:18:49
 
Ask about Oklahoma HB 1627, sponsor Mike ...   Re: Re: Oklahoma, huh?   
Jason Lee
May 1, 2003, 02:35:43
 
I am an Oklahoman too, and looked this u ...   Re: Re: Oklahoma, huh?   
Jeff Smith
May 1, 2003, 08:38:06
 
Perhaps they should be focusing on the m ...   NYC - Open Source   
Bruce
May 1, 2003, 15:11:35
 
> And if Open Source vendors want to pro ...   Re: NYC - Open Source   
Rufus Polson
May 1, 2003, 15:49:01
 
> Ask about Oklahoma HB 1627, sponsor Mi ...   Re: Re: Oklahoma, huh?   
John Eisenmenger
May 1, 2003, 16:42:47
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP