Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Shedding commercial attitudes towards documentation

Will secret copyright treaty restrict your digital rights?

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS

Intel Linux Graphics Shine With Fedora 12




Virtualization Architect
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-Chelsea

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:OSI President Responds to SCO's DoS Claims
OSI President Responds to SCO's DoS Claims
May 7, 2003, 13 :00 UTC (40 Talkback[s]) (15067 reads)

(Other stories by Eric S. Raymond)

In a press release [yesterday], SCO suggests that the Linux community may be responsible for the denial-of-service attack on its servers that occurred on Friday, May 2nd.

This is a baseless slur, unsupported by facts. Anyone tempted to take it seriously should note that neither the Linux community nor the wider open-source community of which it is part has any past record of such behavior. If we fought our battles in those terms, Windows is a sufficiently vulnerable target that we would have severely hammered certain much larger adversaries years ago.

News accounts suggest that the machines subverted into performing the attack were Windows boxes. It would be more reasonable to suppose that the attack was the work not of anyone in the Linux community but of a Windows-based cracker-underground gang that is sympathetic to us and has decided to fight for the "good guys." If that's so, we reject such misguided assistance. Any pro-Linux crackers out there should stand down now and refrain from any such offensives in the future. We cannot accept such "help" and remain the good guys.

Let there be no mistake about this. We in the Linux community do not regard denial-of-service attacks or any other form of criminal trespass as a legitimate tactic in disputes. Sustained as we are by our shared belief that our open-source development model is a better way, we are too proud to fight dirty.

Finally, shame on SCO for attempting to use slurs and insinuations to win in the court of public opinion the anti-Linux verdict that the facts[1] will not entitle them to in court.

I have drafted this statement alone in order to get it out during the current news cycle, but I am in no doubt that other Linux and open-source community leaders will join me in rejecting both SCO's accusation and any use of DoS tactics against SCO or other adversaries.

We will win our fight. But we'll do it cleanly, not by attacking SCO but by refuting their ludicrous accusations and outcompeting them in the free market. --

Eric S. Raymond
President, Open Source Initiative
www.opensource.org

[1] See "OSI Position Paper on the SCO-vs.-IBM Complaint"

Related Stories:
PR: FBI Investigating DDoS Attack, SCO Suspects Link to Linux Community(May 06, 2003)
CNET News: Net Attack Crushes SCO Web Site(May 03, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I don't like SCO, and I'm not sa ...   Oh come on   
Cabal
May 7, 2003, 13:14:39
 
"It would be more reasonable to suppose  ...   Yeah, right ;)   
Gnatz
May 7, 2003, 13:43:13
 
Thank you Mr. Raymond for making this st ...   Thanks   
Jim
May 7, 2003, 14:17:30
 
¨We will win our fight.¨Oh, please! Firs ...   Show a little restrain, Eric   
Ana O´Neemus
May 7, 2003, 14:18:02
 
while SCO's accusation that the linu ...   at this moment, the lawsuit just *isn't* news   
rday
May 7, 2003, 14:28:57
 
The libertarian in ESR forces him to say ...   Futile.   
JR
May 7, 2003, 14:34:58
 
>until SCO comes up with a solid claim a ...   Re: at this moment, the lawsuit just *isn't* n   
Robert
May 7, 2003, 15:01:12
 
Why do we get trash like this? Eric has  ...   Yet another apologist   
phil
May 7, 2003, 15:03:30
 
> I don't like SCO, and I'm not  ...   Re: Oh come on   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 15:27:34
 
> "The terrorist act is the action of so ...   Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 15:29:33
 
>more you make ¨Open Source Advocates¨ l ...   Re: Show a little restrain, Eric   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 15:31:46
 
> ESR, get with the times, your beloved  ...   Re: Futile.   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 15:41:12
 
Sorry but if anyone bothered reading thi ...   Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Nic
May 7, 2003, 16:06:32
 
 I don't like SCO, and I'm not s ...   Re: Oh come on   
Jerry L Kreps
May 7, 2003, 16:23:40
 
Now I just wonder where are these anti-E ...   Thanks ESR -- well stated   
Naf
May 7, 2003, 16:25:33
 
> Sorry but if anyone bothered reading t ...   Re: Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 16:47:26
 
>it is utterly uninformative to read SCO ...   Re: at this moment, the lawsuit just *isn't* n   
Rufus Polson
May 7, 2003, 16:54:55
 
2) They have stated that they do not bel ...   Re: Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
I R A Darth Aggie
May 7, 2003, 16:56:42
 
> Why do we get trash like this? Eric ha ...   Re: Yet another apologist   
maxomai
May 7, 2003, 16:59:14
 
> >  Free and open competition means "an ...   Re: Re: Futile.   
Rufus Polson
May 7, 2003, 17:13:47
 
> Sorry but if anyone bothered reading t ...   Re: Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Rufus Polson
May 7, 2003, 17:52:13
 
>Politicians, commentators and businessm ...   Re: Re: Re: Futile.   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
May 7, 2003, 18:26:14
 
> Why do we get trash like this? Eric ha ...   Re: Yet another apologist   
Tony OBryan
May 7, 2003, 18:47:27
 
> >it is utterly uninformative to read S ...   Re: Re: at this moment, the lawsuit just *isn'   
rday
May 7, 2003, 18:47:33
 
4) For all the 'SCO has never done a ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Wol
May 7, 2003, 18:53:22
 
I see your point but the whole issue is  ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Yeah, right ;)   
Nic
May 7, 2003, 22:16:47
 
> > Thank you Mr. Raymond for making thi ...   Re: Thanks   
Chad McCullough
May 7, 2003, 22:47:02
 
> ¨We will win our fight.¨> Oh, please!  ...   Re: Show a little restrain, Eric   
Chad McCullough
May 7, 2003, 22:49:03
 
Sorry, this is too little too late.  Aft ...   The mouse that roared   
Bob
May 8, 2003, 01:31:58
 
'Ransom Love must be pissing himself ...   Comment of the day...   
Richard N. Turner
May 8, 2003, 05:37:29
 
Listen up, when Caldera buys SCO, elemen ...   Horse S***t   
Sancar Saran
May 8, 2003, 07:12:12
 
Even an action that I initially pooh-poo ...   Re: Re: Re: Re: Futile.   
Wol
May 8, 2003, 07:13:25
 
> Sorry, this is too little too late. Af ...   Re: The mouse that roared   
Rainer Weikusat
May 8, 2003, 10:03:28
 
one final thought on this whole new brou ...   by the way, would ESR please just shut up?   
rday
May 8, 2003, 10:24:22
 
>  You are familiar with Ockham?s Razor? ...   Re: The mouse that roared [Occam's Razor]   
omg
May 8, 2003, 13:51:11
 
..why we have so many trolls against ESR ...   I just don't see any sence...   
Peteris Krisjanis
May 8, 2003, 13:51:39
 
Slashdotters? [sarcasm]Now there's a ...   Re: The mouse that roared   
C. Whitman
May 8, 2003, 14:35:31
 
A quote from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/OC ...   Re: Re: The mouse that roared [Occam's Razor]   
Bob
May 8, 2003, 16:56:14
 
> >  You are familiar with Ockham?s Razo ...   Re: Re: The mouse that roared [Occam's Razor]   
Rufus Polson
May 8, 2003, 22:49:01
 
Why aren't they under suspicion here ...   What about IBM?   
Rufus Polson
May 8, 2003, 23:01:57
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs