Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Using Windows Is Like...

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?

Creating Ebooks with Sigil

Editor's Note: Making Multi-Channel Firewire Music With Linux




Virtualization Architect
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-Chelsea

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Update: InfoWorld: Interview: Unix plus Linux Equals Trouble
Update: InfoWorld: Interview: Unix plus Linux Equals Trouble
May 13, 2003, 18 :56 UTC (55 Talkback[s]) (13057 reads)

(Other stories by Peter Williams)

[Editor's Note: The original VNUnet interview with Chris Sontag was pulled from that site sometime early this morning. A blurb at the original URL now informs readers:

"vnunet.com will be publishing this interview in full on Monday 19 May."
In the meantime, an LT reader (thanks, ll) has discovered another interview with Sontag, this one hosted by InfoWorld. Though the content of the article differs from the VNUnet interview that was pulled, the basic thread of SCO's message is the same. We now link you to the new InfoWorld article. -BKP]

"IDGNS: SuSE feels protected against any legal action you may consider because of contracts with SCO and with UnitedLinux in which you are a member. Do SuSE and other Linux distributors including Red Hat have reason to be worried?

"CS: Regarding contracts we have with SuSE and UnitedLinux, I would unequivocally state that there is nothing in those contracts that provides them with any protection or shelter in the way they are characterizing this in the press. If I were them, I would not be making those kinds of statements.

"IDGNS: Are you planning any legal action against SuSE or Red Hat?

"CS: We have no action planned at this time. Our focus is on the IBM lawsuit. This does not mean, however, that we will not initiate other actions to protect our intellectual property at a future point..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
CNET News: IBM Unfazed by SCO Unix Threat(Mar 11, 2003)
Linux Journal: SCO: We're After IBM, not Linux Developers(Mar 08, 2003)
CNET News: SCO Sues Big Blue over Unix, Linux(Mar 07, 2003)
Are Linux Users Infringing on SCO's Property?(Jan 23, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I am rendered speechless by the contradi ...   Laugh, cry or throttle him?   
Nick Mailer
May 12, 2003, 18:35:09
 
Finally. Somebody raised a possible prob ...   Someone is not understanding   
Bob Persweevant
May 12, 2003, 18:43:52
 
..into kicking them out of United Linux  ...   I think maybe they are trying to goad SuSe   
guinstar
May 12, 2003, 18:48:00
 
If you (SCO) distribute your own IP work ...   Distributing IP for free as source seems contradic   
g
May 12, 2003, 18:56:14
 
Finally. Somebody raised a possible prob ...   No contradiction!?   
Todd
May 12, 2003, 18:59:53
 
Wow talk about dumb.. So SCO is releasin ...   Um.....   
Zach Younker
May 12, 2003, 19:09:09
 
that SCO crashes and burns.  ...   I sincerely hope...   
Mr Sco
May 12, 2003, 19:09:39
 
Just when you thought SCO couldn't g ...   Bizarro World of SCO   
Burt Noir
May 12, 2003, 19:31:24
 
> What you are saying then is: if there  ...   Liable by default   
Eric Laffoon
May 12, 2003, 19:35:29
 
A question to the lawyers, aren't SC ...   Violation of GPL   
Volker
May 12, 2003, 19:35:56
 
So much for "we won't go after Linux ...   Yeah, right...   
Penguinisto
May 12, 2003, 19:41:32
 
I don't think they are in violation  ...   Re: Violation of GPL   
ac
May 12, 2003, 20:08:43
 
I'm no lawyer; but it seems to me th ...   Legal liability for negligence?   
Richard Westerveld
May 12, 2003, 20:21:50
 
Gee.... Maybe I need to look at some of  ...   Like :: Like/sarcasm   
Nicholas Donovan
May 12, 2003, 20:33:16
 
Part of the issue here is who owns the c ...   Who owns the copyright?   
cc
May 12, 2003, 20:43:53
 
The question about the outside investmen ...   other investors   
ac
May 12, 2003, 20:51:54
 
> ... One question I have is that since  ...   Re: Distributing IP for free as source seems contr   
Zartan
May 12, 2003, 20:55:34
 
...I'm not sure if that comment is a ...   Linux is *NOT* derived from Mach...   
engineer_scotty
May 12, 2003, 21:17:31
 
> > ... One question I have is that sinc ...   Re: Re: Distributing IP for free as source seems c   
Steve Wilson
May 12, 2003, 21:58:43
 
Every other possibility seems pointless. ...   Is SCO trying to own linux?   
scott_R
May 12, 2003, 22:43:36
 
rummanged around and  old parchment  wri ...   This GUYwent to the garage sale   
joe guin
May 12, 2003, 23:54:01
 
> I don't think they are in violatio ...   Re: Re: Violation of GPL   
Rufus Polson
May 13, 2003, 00:21:23
 
> When SCO distributes a distribution, t ...   Re: Who owns the copyright?   
Rufus Polson
May 13, 2003, 00:34:08
 
This interview shows SCO's true inte ...   True intentions   
Bojan Smojver
May 13, 2003, 01:23:39
 
> > When SCO distributes a distribution, ...   Re: Re: Who owns the copyright?   
Nicholas Donovan
May 13, 2003, 02:43:55
 
he is hollucinating...perhaps he is smok ...   what an 1d10t   
Xunil Ung
May 13, 2003, 03:36:17
 
As those who are familiar with the GPL w ...   damning evidence.   
Scott Marlowe
May 13, 2003, 03:36:30
 
It is amazing to see that some companies ...   SCO and the Sure Way To Become More Hated Than MS   
is
May 13, 2003, 03:39:55
 
I don't think they are suing over an ...   Re: Re: Re: Violation of GPL   
ac
May 13, 2003, 04:42:13
 
If they can make claims against outfits  ...   Re: Re: Who owns the copyright?   
cc
May 13, 2003, 05:30:12
 
Hey SCO'ers do you think you may sca ...   Bulls**t   
Sancar Saran
May 13, 2003, 06:46:39
 
> rummanged around and  old parchment  w ...   Re: This GUYwent to the garage sale   
Colin Walls
May 13, 2003, 07:13:57
 
When SCO distributes a distribution, the ...   Re: Who owns the copyright?   
Wol
May 13, 2003, 07:59:27
 
Does anybody have copy of the whole VNUn ...   the original VNUnet article missing - censorship&#   
David Haring
May 13, 2003, 09:03:49
 
They are like the software company equiv ...   re: Bizarro World of SCO   
H. Paijmans
May 13, 2003, 09:28:14
 
> If they can make claims against outfit ...   Re: Re: Who owns the copyright?   
GuyCLO~
May 13, 2003, 12:45:37
 
He not talking to us.  He's trying t ...   Re: Like :: Like/sarcasm   
Charles Hixson
May 13, 2003, 14:23:59
 
My guess is that some lawyer there saw t ...   Not substantially the same   
Scott Marlowe
May 13, 2003, 19:26:09
 
> My guess is that some lawyer there saw ...   No GPL violation, but they are still scum   
David McGuire
May 13, 2003, 20:10:43
 
Chris Sontag: the Mohammed Saeed al-Saha ...   Comical Chris?   
J. F. Solem
May 13, 2003, 20:25:12
 
It might be worth assuming that under so ...   trying to make sense of it   
ac
May 13, 2003, 20:55:39
 
After spouting baseless lies week after  ...   Don't buy them, sue them and their shareholder   
Joe User
May 13, 2003, 22:55:56
 
>The idea that SCO somehow kills their l ...   Re: No GPL violation, but they are still scum   
Andreas Øye
May 14, 2003, 00:33:19
 
Alright, call it a wacked-out conspiracy ...   Wacked-out conspiracy theory.   
Ned Ulbricht
May 14, 2003, 01:05:24
 
The irrational thing is:  Why are they g ...   Re: trying to make sense of it   
ac
May 14, 2003, 02:06:42
 
>>Well, in this case it seems that you a ...   Re: Re: No GPL violation, but they are still scum   
ac
May 14, 2003, 04:31:15
 
As long as 'SCO executives' keep ...   Still FUD   
Rainer Weikusat
May 14, 2003, 04:38:31
 
> Hell, even with the worst of judges/ju ...   M$ Tampering   
JSG
May 14, 2003, 05:47:15
 
... hmmm. I think this afternoon I will  ...   Burning my SCO CD's   
Roman Fietze
May 14, 2003, 07:24:12
 
I'll restrict myself to this one:Wha ...   Re: trying to make sense of it   
Wol
May 14, 2003, 07:55:56
 
Funny how Caldera became SCO all of a su ...   SCO is still Caldera   
Tom Adelstein
May 14, 2003, 13:15:58
 
The most likely scenario to me is that S ...   They want to sell, not win...   
cjm
May 14, 2003, 14:34:35
 
It will be a lot of fun if SCO decides t ...   Re: Re: trying to make sense of it   
Wol
May 14, 2003, 15:21:48
 
>We have the ability to withdraw or pull ...   IBM and June 13   
Sjaak zomer
May 14, 2003, 15:58:57
 
> Clause 4 means they need to go begging ...   Re: Re: Re: trying to make sense of it   
Rufus Polson
May 14, 2003, 17:39:02
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs