Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?

Creating Ebooks with Sigil

Editor's Note: Making Multi-Channel Firewire Music With Linux

Amaya: A Simple, Yet Useful Alternative to Dreamweaver

Windows 7 Sales Up, But is it Really a Hit?




UNIX System Administrator - SUN Solaris, Veritas, EMC, Shell Scripting, SAN (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:LinuxWorld: Why the Best for Linux is Still to Come
LinuxWorld: Why the Best for Linux is Still to Come
May 30, 2003, 01 :00 UTC (8 Talkback[s]) (13883 reads)

(Other stories by Joe Barr)

[ Thanks to Joe Barr for this link. ]

"Hidden away in a seemingly routine industry news story by John Spooner at CNet last week was the most important PC desktop news of the year. Maybe of the past ten years. Unfortunately, the story was wrong. Michael Kanellos, Editor of Enterprise Computing and Personal Technology at CNet, told me that IBM did not [get] its story right the first time. IBM won't preload Linux after all.

"The announcement--had it been true--would have been a much more important one than Microsoft signing an SCO Unix license. It would have represented a frontal assault on the most sacred ground of the Microsoft monopoly: preloads for desktop computers. It's been a long time since a major OEM has had the courage to preload something other than Windows, even in dual-boot configurations. Don't write to me about Dell. Dell was never in the game to play. If you did manage to special-order from Dell a Linux laptop or desktop you still paid for Windows even though Dell didn't load it.

"SCO's pathetic attempt to grab a golden IP parachute on the way down is newsworthy, and I'm not saying otherwise. However, an IBM announcement to preload Linux on the desktop would have signaled the official beginning of DW II--Desktop Wars continued. The real struggle is not between SCO and IBM. Neither is it just between IBM, SCO, Novell, and Microsoft. The real struggle is between Microsoft and Linux. The monopoly is desperately trying to fend off the inevitable and prevent free/open source software from ending its monopoly..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
CNET News: Commentary: IBM Will Nullify SCO's Linux Threat(May 29, 2003)
Tonight LIVE: The Smoking Gun? Microsoft's Back Door Funding of SCO!(May 20, 2003)
CNET News: The Fear War Against Linux (May 19, 2003)
SearchEnterpriseLinux: Beyond the Survey: IT Pros Sound Off on Linux Desktops(Mar 19, 2003)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Good article.  Perhaps you are getting b ...   Joe...   
ac
May 30, 2003, 02:55:24
 
Linux has Microsoft on the run on the se ...   occam's razor   
copy_chief
May 30, 2003, 12:56:45
 
I agree, great article ^^  ...   ...Joe ^^   
Cristian
May 30, 2003, 13:01:44
 
This is sort of pointless. You could hav ...   When was this written? 1996? 1999? 200   
Paul Thurrott
May 30, 2003, 13:39:29
 
> This is sort of pointless. You could h ...   Re: When was this written? 1996? 1999?   
Joe Barr
May 30, 2003, 15:48:46
 
> This is sort of pointless. You could h ...   Re: When was this written? 1996? 1999?   
Surreal
May 30, 2003, 15:49:01
 
Way to go Joe....That dirtbag is the rea ...   Joe   
da
May 30, 2003, 20:02:07
 
> This is sort of pointless. You could h ...   Re: When was this written? 1996? 1999?   
Jon
Jun 1, 2003, 02:50:52
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs