Groklaw: SCO Loses Motion to Bifurcate--SCO Motion to Delay Partly Denied, Partly Granted
Jun 11, 2004, 16:00 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Pamela Jones)
"There is no moss growing on the Honorable Dale Kimball. Now
comes word that SCO's Motion to Bifurcate the patent claims has
also been denied without prejudice to renew after all dispositive
motions have been decided. That is what IBM said made sense to do,
wait until it is clear what is actually going to trial. Personally,
I am guessing that would be nothing. What a waste of time it was to
even bring this motion now. Perhaps that was the purpose.
"On SCO's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order, in which SCO
asked for delays (not IBM, despite McBride's comments during the
teleconference Thursday that it was IBM delaying), the judge said
that because IBM's 14 counterclaims were added after the original
scheduling order was set, and because he is denying SCO's motion to
separate the patent claims, he is giving them a bit more
time..."
Complete
Story
Related Stories: