Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections: Blog - Developer - High Performance - Infrastructure - IT Management - Security - Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Red Hat Brings Gluster to Amazon Cloud

New Linux kernel fixes power-saving issues

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level

Commercial Support now available for the open-source NGINX Web server

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:eWeek: Analysts: Novell vs. SCO Is No 'Slam Dunk'
eWeek: Analysts: Novell vs. SCO Is No 'Slam Dunk'
Aug 5, 2005, 17 :30 UTC (12 Talkback[s]) (8138 reads)
(Other stories by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols)

[ Thanks to Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols for this link. ]

"When Novell, in the latest move in the SCO-Novell lawsuit, demanded royalties from SCO's recent Unix licensing business, the company served notice that it was playing for keeps.

"But how good are Novell Inc.'s chances of winning its counterclaims against The SCO Group Inc. and proving that it, and not SCO, owns Unix's intellectual property...?"

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Computerworld: Novell to SCO Group: Drop Dead(Aug 04, 2005)
Groklaw: Novell Files Answer and Counterclaims, and Tells Us the Rest of the SCO Story(Jul 30, 2005)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
From the U.S. Copyright Office website:> ...   It's not ambiguous at all.   
Jimmy the Geek
Aug 5, 2005, 18:12:24  
The way I read it is that if Santa Cruz ...   The way I read it.   
SM
Aug 5, 2005, 20:10:04  
SCO is arguing that Novell slandered the ...   There is no way SCO can win. (Not that Novell wil   
error27
Aug 5, 2005, 20:10:15  
and she has convinced me that it is all ...   PJ is never wrong,   
A Thurston
Aug 5, 2005, 20:51:56  
"Ferrell argued that because of the word ...   Dumb lawyers   
Tony OBryan
Aug 5, 2005, 21:08:48  
I don't get it. I read previously th ...   Isn't this a pig in a poke?   
Eric Laffoon
Aug 5, 2005, 21:31:58  
[snip] The only explanation I can think ...   Re: Dumb lawyers   
Ken Jennings
Aug 5, 2005, 22:32:33  
What rights did Santa Cruz purchase? Wel ...   Sort of   
rm6990
Aug 5, 2005, 23:34:24  
To be fair, Novell has just asked the co ...   Re: It's not ambiguous at all.   
Charles Hixson
Aug 6, 2005, 00:58:03  
The problem is, he's been handed a b ...   Re: Dumb lawyers   
Charles Hixson
Aug 6, 2005, 01:03:07  
Not so fast there. SCO winning the case ...   Not to fast   
phil
Aug 6, 2005, 15:56:14  
I'd like to see what SCO says in res ...   SCO response   
Stomfi
Aug 7, 2005, 07:57:20  
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP