Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Commercial Support now available for the open-source NGINX Web server

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3

60 Fantastic Free Android Apps



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Open to Misinterpretation
Open to Misinterpretation
Aug 2, 2007, 00 :30 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (6427 reads)

(Other stories by Richard Hillesley)

[ Thanks to An Anonymous Reader for this link. ]

"Before 'open source,' before free software, there was software in the public domain. You could say that software in the public domain was truly free. The code was 'open source' and the user had the right to take it, break it, appropriate it, re-use it, package it, sell it, re-brand and license it, or do what you will with it.

"The problem with software in the public domain, was that, more often than not, any changes to the software didn't come back to the developer in any usable form, and modifications didn't revert to the original maintainer of the code. In some cases the software was appropriated and relicensed by the user. In other words there was no guarantee that the software would remain free, or would grow..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
The Pendulum Has Swung in the Open Source Debate(Aug 01, 2007)
Freetards in Deep Denial(Aug 01, 2007)
Tim O'Reilly, Eben Moglen, and Jane Jacobs(Aug 01, 2007)
Why Microsoft is pushing its licenses for OSI approval(Jul 31, 2007)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
>In other words there was no guarantee t ...   ARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH   
Dean Pannell (aka dinotrac)
Aug 2, 2007, 15:15:23
 
> >In other words there was no guarantee ...   Re: ARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH   
Rufus Polson
Aug 2, 2007, 16:50:15
 
>I don't recall public domain code s ...   Re:Re: ARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH   
Dean Pannell (a.k.a. dinotrac)
Aug 2, 2007, 18:24:36
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP