Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Amahi Linux Home Server 4.2

Matthias Ettrich Receives German Federal Cross of Merit

Using Windows Is Like...

Installing Ubuntu 9.10

Hands-on: OpenMoko WikiReader is simple, appealing

Perl far from dead, more popular than you think

Microsoft Exchange alternatives

Kubuntu 9.10: A Mixed Bag

Could Microsoft switch to Linux?

Red Hat Virtualization Manager for Windows Only?




Systems Implementation Engineer II – Disk-Based Back-Up/Replication/RedHat Linux (PA)
Next Step Systems
US-PA-Philadelphia

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Open Source Licensing: Obsolete or Of Importance?
Open Source Licensing: Obsolete or Of Importance?
Mar 17, 2008, 23 :15 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (3184 reads)

(Other stories by Stephen O'Grady)

"Once besieged by basic questions ranging from 'is it open source?' to 'will it make money?,' the open source world is increasingly facing more mature, nuanced questions and assertions.

"One such that has been picking up steam of late is that open source licensing is less important than commonly assumed. Reacting to a piece from the 451 Group, Eclipse's Ian Skerrett makes the case that trademarks are the real strategic weapon. Tim O'Reilly, for his part, has famously declared that 'open source licenses are obsolete,' largely due to their irrelevance (the Affero and such licenses presumably excepted) to those--like Amazon, Google, et al--that do not distribute software in the traditional sense..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
ExtJS: When Open Source is Not Open at All(Feb 26, 2008)
Pundits' Field Day with "Open" Microsoft(Feb 22, 2008)
How to Create a Desktop Linux Monopoly(Feb 14, 2008)
IP Issues with OOXML--Who's Afraid of the GPL?(Feb 11, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
if it wasnt for the open licenses of lin ...   how quickly we forget   
patrick_darcy
Mar 18, 2008, 03:48:56
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs