Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Linux Tips & Tricks: Converting PDF-s to pictures in Linux

Ultimate Firefox Productivity Tips: For the Geeks.

GoldenDict: A Dictionary Nugget

Would You Like Linux With Your Jello?

Why I Use Linux: Lofton’s Story

Go to Toys 'R Us for your Linux netbook needs

Sun xVM VirtualBox 3.0: Virtual Developer's Delight

Apple Wary of Ogg Theora: No Agreement Yet on HTML5 Video Standard

Freedom is not Free for Countries nor Computer Users

Eyecandy Themes For Ubuntu - Download directly from Synaptic - No More Hassles




Senior Windows Engineer (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:MySQL Engines: MyISAM vs. InnoDB
MySQL Engines: MyISAM vs. InnoDB
Apr 30, 2008, 06 :00 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (4800 reads)

(Other stories by Narayan Newton)

[ Thanks to An Anonymous Reader for this link. ]

"InnoDB is commonly viewed as anything but performant, especially when compared to MyISAM. Many actually call it slow. This view is mostly supported by old facts and mis-information. In reality, you would be very hard-pressed to find a current, production-quality MySQL Database Engine with the CPU efficiency of InnoDB. It has its performance "quirks" and there are definitely workloads for which it is not optimal, but for standard OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) loads, it is tough to find a better, safer fit.

"The performance claims for InnoDB are not idle, there are numbers to back it up and benchmarks run by some of the most well-respected MySQL consulting firms in existence. For example, the people behind mysqlperformanceblog.com, a leading MySQL tuning and optimization site run by Percona, ran a benchmark comparing Falcon, MyISAM and InnoDB..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
MySQL in the Firing Line Again as IBM Snaps Up SolidDB(Dec 21, 2007)
Zmanda: MySQL Online Backup(Nov 13, 2006)
Linux.com: MySQL to Drop Berkeley DB Storage Engine, Add memcache Plugin(Aug 31, 2006)
SearchOpenSource: Dumping Microsoft SQL Server: MySQL, PostgreSQL Attract Big Users(Jul 28, 2006)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP