Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Tech Comics: "Groundhog Day"

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:KDE 4.1 Beta 2: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
KDE 4.1 Beta 2: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Jul 7, 2008, 19 :00 UTC (5 Talkback[s]) (6524 reads)

(Other stories by Bruce Byfield)

"KDE 4.1 is supposed to make everything right with the recently troubled desktop. Everyone agrees now that KDE 4.0 was a mistake. However, what the mistake was--and whose--is a matter of opinion. KDE developers blame distributions for rushing to include a release that was never intended for everyday use, while users blame developers for changing everything.

"On the Fedora list, some are calling for keeping KDE 3.5 as an option in future releases of the distro, while one reviewer has suggested that KDE development should be forked, so that no one has to use the 4.x version. To these reactions, which seem as much a fear of the new as legitimate criticism, KDE speakers have replied by encouraging everyone to wait for the improvements coming in 4.1..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
KDE Developer Quits(Jul 04, 2008)
A User's Freedom to Choose(Jul 03, 2008)
The Critics are Wrong: KDE 4 Doesn't Need a Fork(Jul 02, 2008)
KDE: It's Time For a Fork... Is It Really?(Jul 01, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
"Very likely, KDE users will have to wai ...   KDE 4.x and Fedora 10   
B
Jul 8, 2008, 00:25:31
 
I say: put down the pitch fork, extingui ...   To my fellow angry villagers   
blackbelt_jones
Jul 8, 2008, 05:28:24
 
No one is going to fork KDE.  That was o ...   To my fellow angry villagers   
kanetheninja
Jul 8, 2008, 13:26:48
 
> No one is going to fork KDE.  That was ...   Re: To my fellow angry villagers   
blackbelt_jones
Jul 9, 2008, 03:07:02
 
. > Its interesting though in the "artic ...   "I don't know what you're saying, but it&#   
blackbelt_jones
Jul 9, 2008, 05:34:29
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP