Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Google Offers Migration Tool for Microsoft Exchange Data

OpenOffice.org Project of the Month: the Irish community

Ten Years of OpenOffice.org

Loading ... Loading ... Top Ten One-Liners from CommandLineFu Explained

Mailing Lists Are Parties. Or They Should Be.

Project: Building An All-Text Linux Workstation

Cool: Or Hot? Linux really making your coffee, live a linux coffee machine

Editor's Note: All This Great Technology Just to Reinvent Television

Kubuntu is not Ubuntu

Claws Mail: Mail with Attitude




HPC Linux Administrator (IL)
Next Step Systems
US-IL-Chicago

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Linguistic Problems of GPL Advocacy
Linguistic Problems of GPL Advocacy
Jul 9, 2008, 17 :15 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (4761 reads)

"The first disagreement I wish to address concerns the statement 'BSD projects are free, but GPL projects stay free.' GPL advocates cannot understand why the BSD advocates are not getting this point, and BSD advocates make accusations of Communism, which are then argued to death by both parties. The problem with the statement above is the different interpretation of the word 'project.' I, and I suspect many other BSD advocates, generally separate the concept of 'project' from 'code.' While code is what projects are made of, I do not see it as valuable as the useful product a project provides. When I write a program, be it a site scraper, or a todo program, or a UI framework, I think of my project as the entity that matters. The fact that I may have copied some code from one to another is of no concern to me.

"A GPL advocate sees an entirely different situation. To him, it is the code that comes first, and the applications built from that code are a secondary consideration..."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Open Source Licensing: SugarCRM's Original Way to Abide the GPL(Dec 06, 2007)
Advocacy 101: Don't Preach, Ask Questions(Aug 10, 2007)
Metasploit: Join the Arms Race(Jul 10, 2007)
GPLv3 License Marks GNU's Decline(Jun 30, 2007)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
Is this whole post flamebait? 1. I don&# ...   my /. post on this: Flamebait?   
drew Roberts
Jul 9, 2008, 19:06:22
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP


The Network for Technology Professionals

Search:

About Internet.com

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers