Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Mastering Grub 2 The Easy Way

Shedding commercial attitudes towards documentation

Will secret copyright treaty restrict your digital rights?

Saving the "Best" for Last - Fedora 12 (Constantine)

LinuxCertified Announces its next Linux System and Network Administration BootCamp

The Problem With The Linux Community

Vim 101: A Beginner's Guide to Vim

Open Source Science: A Revolution From Within

openSUSE 11.2-- Incremental Updates, Plenty of Polish

Microsoft, other rivals slam Google Chrome OS




SiteMinder / Webhosting
The Computer Merchant, Ltd
US-MA-North Quincy

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:.. so I got one of the new Intel SSDs
.. so I got one of the new Intel SSDs
Oct 8, 2008, 15 :31 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (4221 reads)

(Other stories by Linus Torvalds)

"And the sad part is that other SSDs generally absolutely suck when it comes to especially random write performance. And small random writes is what you get when you update various filesystem meta-data on any normal filesystem, so it really does matter. For example, a vendor who shall remain nameless has an SSD disk out there that they were also hawking at the Kernel Summit, and while they get fine throughput (something like 50+MB/s on big contiguous writes), they benchmark a pitiful 10 (yes, that's ten, as in "how many fingers do you have) small random writes per second. That is slower than a rotational disk."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Intel Ships Solid-state Drives for PCs, Plans Server Version(Sep 10, 2008)
32GB Flash Chips Target Mobile Devices(Aug 08, 2008)
SSD vs. SATA RAID: A Performance Benchmark(Jul 30, 2008)
A Tweaker's Guide to Solid State Disks (SSDs) and Linux(Jul 28, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
  Linus clearly dislikes Itanium? Why? A ...   Why the comments about Itanium?   
JK
Oct 8, 2008, 17:12:00
 
> Linus clearly dislikes Itanium? Why? A ...   Re: Why the comments about Itanium?   
Zartan
Oct 10, 2008, 00:08:01
 
When the Itanium first silicon did not y ...   Re: Re: Why the comments about Itanium?   
George Mann
Nov 9, 2008, 03:04:37
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP

internet.commediabistro.comJusttechjobs.comGraphics.com

Search:

WebMediaBrands Corporate Info

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | Shopping | E-mail Offers | Freelance Jobs