Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
search.internet.com
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Become a Marketplace Partner

internet.commerce
Be a Commerce Partner














The Linux Channel at internet.com
Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Easy (and amazing) Debian for the N900

Insight into GNU/Linux boot process

Reviewed: OpenOffice.org 3.2

Creating An NFS-Like Standalone Storage Server With GlusterFS On CentOS 5.4

Open Source is Not a Democracy

Open Source Gets Political

Open source and the Morevna project

Android market going down the drain?

All Done With Ubuntu

Google Offers Migration Tool for Microsoft Exchange Data




Systems Engineer Sr - Solaris - Linux (TX)
Next Step Systems
US-TX-Houston

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Which is More Important? Open File Format or Free Software?
Which is More Important? Open File Format or Free Software?
Dec 8, 2008, 17 :04 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (3293 reads)

(Other stories by Hung Chao-Kuei)

[ Thanks to Chao-Kuei Hung for this link. ]

"This title sounds like a silly question. Open file formats serve everybody (except the monopolist), free software users and proprietary software users alike. Free software typically supports open file formats by default, and then maybe also some popular proprietary file format by necessity. Is there ever a situation where supporting/writing free software hurts open file format?

"Indeed there might just be one very interesting example: the docx plugin for firefox. I will leave the debate as to whether MS PL counts as a free software licnese to the lawyers (or philosophers). What I would like to point out is, whether this license is free enough, this particular piece of software is hurting us."

Complete Story


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
I belive that, open file formats are muc ...   Open FIle FOrmats are more important   
Leo Loikkanen
Dec 8, 2008, 17:35:58
 
It's to shun the Monopolist and it&# ...   Which is more important??   
Jose_X
Dec 9, 2008, 00:17:55
 
Taken as an abstract question I would sa ...   Free Software vs Open Formats   
blackhole
Dec 9, 2008, 14:44:42
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!






..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP


The Network for Technology Professionals

Search:

About Internet.com

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers