Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Benchmarked: Firefox Javascript on Linux and Windows - and it's not pretty
Benchmarked: Firefox Javascript on Linux and Windows - and it's not pretty
Feb 11, 2009, 17 :32 UTC (6 Talkback[s]) (8075 reads)

"We wanted to find out just how well the Linux version of Firefox faces up against its Windows equivalent, so we ran the benchmarks from all three browser makers to make sure we got a full range of results. Some specifics you probably want to know:

"* We used Firefox 3.0.6 running on Windows XP SP3 and Fedora 10. Both were running in 32-bit mode.
* Our test machine was a quad-core Intel Core 2 running at 2.66GHz, with 4GB of RAM and 1.5TB of hard drive space.
* The three tests we used were: SunSpider, V8 Benchmark 3 and Dromaeo (using "Recommended Tests").
* We have marked in red where Linux performance falls behind Windows for a given test, and vice versa. In short, red numbers are the ones that scored lower."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
AMD Shanghai Opteron: Linux vs. OpenSolaris Benchmarks(Feb 10, 2009)
Kernel Log: What's new in 2.6.29 -ACPI, PCI, PM - notebooks and power saving improvements(Feb 01, 2009)
Ubuntu 9.04 Boots in 21.4 Seconds(Jan 14, 2009)
Super fast Ext4 filesystem arrives in Ubuntu 9.04(Jan 14, 2009)
Features of Phoronix Test Suite 1.6 "Tydal"(Jan 13, 2009)
Linux Solid-State Drive Benchmarks(Jan 04, 2009)
Great Linux Innovations Of 2008(Dec 30, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
It's about different applications, r ...   This is not Linux-related.   
Rainer Weikusat
Feb 11, 2009, 19:32:52
 
So many tens of millions of dollars, if  ...   Designed for Windows.. ported to Linux   
Jose_X
Feb 11, 2009, 22:19:30
 
I've done performance measurement wo ...   Worthless test   
Grishnakh
Feb 11, 2009, 22:31:29
 
Well you sound very angry at Microsoft a ...   Re: Designed for Windows.. ported to Linux   
k
Feb 12, 2009, 02:32:23
 
Come OnThe issue has and will be for som ...   Testing   
John Trottier
Feb 12, 2009, 02:57:31
 
> Discrediting .NET/Mono just because it ...   Re: Re: Designed for Windows.. ported to Linux   
none
Feb 12, 2009, 09:30:06
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP