Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Using Wii remote with Android Device- Taking Gaming to the Next Level

Commercial Support now available for the open-source NGINX Web server

Linux Top 5: Linux's New Fellow

RebeccaBlackOS - First Live CD Running Wayland Display Server

The Linux powered LAN Gaming House

5 Best Android Apps For Reddit Lovers

SECURITY: Flash Player Sandbox Comes to Firefox

The Future of Kubuntu

SECURITY: Symantec should not be afraid of 'open' source code

Linux 3.3 rc3



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Why "open source" is not "free software"
Why "open source" is not "free software"
Feb 12, 2009, 14 :31 UTC (3 Talkback[s]) (4217 reads)

(Other stories by Dario Borghino)

"Suppose just for a single moment that you're a student reading a Physics book which explains the Theory of Relativity. You are able to read the book, use the notorious formula E=mc^2 to solve all of your exercises and, if you're a particularly brilliant student, perhaps even start from there to come up with a new formula leading to a new scientific discovery. In other words, the scientific knowledge is in the public domain, free for everybody to use, modify and redistribute -- you don't have to pay a royalty to Einstein's nephew every time you solve a difficult physics exercise or you daydream about time-space travel.

"The world of technology, on the other hand, is largely dominated by patents, which makes it a "closed" and competitive model, in which knowledge is rarely shared without money being involved. Companies strive to patent their latest technological innovation and maximize their capitalization, as one might expect. Sadly this has a number of important consequences: the license with which a patented item is distributed to the public often prohibits reverse-engineering and, in general, any attempt at understanding the mechanism through which that piece of technology works."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Linux Defenders organize to fight patent trolls(Feb 03, 2009)
Linux Community Begins Crafting Radio Ad(Feb 02, 2009)
Supplement Creative Commons with open standards(Jan 15, 2009)
Creative Commons Asks How You Define "Non-Commercial"(Dec 05, 2008)
Saving the Intellectual Commons with Open Source(Dec 04, 2008)
Healing the Rift Between Wikipedia and Creative Commons(Nov 04, 2008)
FSF Releases New Version of GNU Free Documentation License(Nov 04, 2008)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
The "free software" push failed for 20 y ...   bollocks   
Art Cancro
Feb 12, 2009, 15:53:57
 
The "free software" push failed for 20 y ...   Re: bollocks   
Rich Steiner
Feb 12, 2009, 17:40:50
 
Without the GPL Linux would have been lo ...   GPL was required for the success of the libre soft   
Jimmy the Geek
Feb 14, 2009, 05:59:05
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP