Alex Brown: OOXML Revealed "JTC1 Procedures Were Rubbish" -- Sure Enough, Problems Surface

"The OOXML approval was marred by procedures that were rubbish, eh? How about the result, then? Wasn't that exactly what the four appeals against adoption of OOXML stated as one basis, that the process was essentially rubbish? Were they right? One year later, it seems there are indeed some problems. Brown tells us on his blog that at the BRM "a number of existing Ecma-376 documents were unintentionally made invalid against the IS29500 transitional schema".

"Oops.

"The UK, he writes, now is suggesting a retroactive fix to undo the changes made at the BRM. Say, what? Rubbish though they be, is there any JTC1 procedure that makes *that* an appropriate way forward? If so, why bother to even meet? Just let Microsoft or its little elves slip in anything they want and call it good.

"That's not all. According to Jomar Silva of Brazil, who attended the BRM and just received the secret report on progress on OOXML, several items that were supposed to be fixed are still not incorporated into the published text of the standard one year later, despite the fact that he says some voted a conditional Yes, contingent on those changes being made."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Taking Control of Your Documents(Mar 25, 2009)
• Tux Fleets of USB Keys to Boldly Go Where No Windows Has Gone Before(Mar 24, 2009)
• Micosoft man encounters Linux storm(Jan 21, 2009)
• The OpenSuse FAQ Touched me in a Bad Place(Dec 17, 2008)
• When Being Proprietary Makes You Do Stupid Things(Dec 12, 2008)
• 10 Standards Recommendations for the Obama Administration(Dec 08, 2008)
• OOXML Documentation: ISO Concerned(Oct 09, 2008)
• OOXML Leaked: The Stuff ISO Doesn�t Want You to Have (Updated)(Oct 04, 2008)
• The OOXML Appeals: What Next?(Aug 06, 2008)
• MS-OOXML: A Format Without a Future?(Aug 05, 2008)