Fair Use, Turnitin, And... Why Google Never Should Have Caved On Book Scanning

"Unfortunately, as we all know, Google caved in that lawsuit and settled -- though, now we're watching as many are challenging whether the settlement terms are legal or reasonable. I still think Google should have stuck with the pure fair use defense, showing that its use was transformative and different - similar to just indexing websites for linking purposes. Not only is it unfortunate that Google gave this up, because it's one less strong precedent over fair use, but it's now opened up the ridiculous claims by a bunch of other industries (newspapers, recording) demanding that Google "settle" with them as well, and hand over cash."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• On open source vs. disclosed source voting systems(Apr 16, 2009)
• A Simple Approach To Grabbing Streaming Audio Playlists With Unix Or Linux(Apr 15, 2009)
• Warner Music Group: All your memories belong to us(Apr 10, 2009)
• The GPL - not fade away(Mar 30, 2009)
• Copyright Office Should Right DMCA Wrongs in Rulemaking(Dec 03, 2008)
• Judge: Copyright Owners Must Consider 'Fair Use' Before Sending Takedown Notice(Aug 22, 2008)
• Free Software Magazine: Free Art and Copyright Conflicts(Oct 28, 2005)
• New York Times: Copyright Lawsuit Is Turnabout for SCO(Oct 13, 2003)
• CNET News: Congress to Take on Spam, Copyright(Jan 09, 2003)
• Asia Times: A Copyright Known as Copyleft(Dec 03, 2002)