SCO Motion for More Exclusivity Denied, the March MORs, and A Proposed Amicus in the Novell Appeal
Apr 23, 2009, 20:03 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Pamela Jones)
"In the appeal of SCO v. Novell, there are some events to note
as well. There is a request to file an amicus brief by Wayne Gray.
Yes, that Wayne Gray. The iNUX trademark guy. To help you
contextualize, the Middle District of Florida's Tampa Division
recently granted motions on summary judgment brought by X/Open and
Novell in the Gray v. Novell et al iNUX/UNIX trademark litigation,
tossing out all 11 claims in Gray's complaint. The Order [PDF] also
denied Gray's summary judgment motion.
"Here's the denial of SCO's extension of exclusivity deadline in
the bankruptcy, before we get to the appeal:
Complete
Story
Related Stories:
- ECIS Provides A History of Microsoft's AntiCompetitive Behavior(Apr 22, 2009)
- No Minix code in Linux Ever -- More Evidence(Apr 20, 2009)
- Alex Brown: OOXML Revealed "JTC1 Procedures Were Rubbish" -- Sure Enough, Problems Surface(Apr 13, 2009)
- On Newspapers and Google: What's the Real Problem Here? What Do Readers Want?(Apr 11, 2009)
- TomTom - "Settled, But Not Over Yet" says SFLC - Update(Apr 01, 2009)
- TomTom & Microsoft Settle..."ensures TomTom's full compliance...under the GPLv2"(Mar 30, 2009)
- Microsoft Internet Explorer vs. Firefox brief comparison guide(Mar 27, 2009)
- SCO's Appeal Brief, as text, and Something Odd - Update: Hearing May 6(Mar 10, 2009)
- Bilski Is Ruled Dispositive: In Re Ferguson, as text(Mar 09, 2009)
