Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Tech Comics: "Groundhog Day"

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:The Case Against Software Patents - Red Hat's EPO-G3/08 Amicus Brief
The Case Against Software Patents - Red Hat's EPO-G3/08 Amicus Brief
Jun 7, 2009, 06 :02 UTC (0 Talkback[s]) (4265 reads)

(Other stories by Pamela Jones)

"Now, let's look at some of the other amicus briefs that were submitted to the European Patent Office, or EPO, in the G3/08 case, being now referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeals. I want to show you in particular Red Hat's submission, which I have as text for you, and a snippet or two from a couple of other briefs submitted by FOSS community members. This is part of our continuing conversation on whether software should be patentable.

"As you know, the EU doesn't allow patents on "computer programs as such", but what does that mean? In practice, less and less, and Red Hat addresses that head on:

"The central issue in this referral is the meaning of the computer program exclusion of Article 52 EPC....In other words, the Board assumed that "computer programs as such" refers to a special class of computer programs that is different from the computer programs that are patentable. This assumption has no linguistic or logical foundation...."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
Donald Knuth: Mathematical Ideas, or Algorithms, Should Not Be Patented(Jun 05, 2009)
Bing is not Google, but it is a spin engine.(Jun 03, 2009)
Supreme Court to rule on "methods" patents (Bilski)(Jun 02, 2009)
Open Source Consolidation: Less is More?(May 22, 2009)
Newham and the Prisoner's Dilemma(May 20, 2009)
Microsoft now all about cooperation? Yes, thanks to patents(May 20, 2009)
Burying the truth? Boycott Novell hit by Denial of Service attack(May 19, 2009)



No talkbacks posted.
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP