From Russia with Linux
Jul 27, 2009, 14:02 (2 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Hans Bezemer)
[ Thanks to Hans
Bezemer for this link. ]
"It can simply not be maintained that computer hardware
is specifically designed for Windows. If it were, we wouldn't be
able to run Linux and since we are, it isn't. If such a policy were
adopted, we would get our money back for every piece of unused
Microsoft software. No hassle!
"But then again, Microsoft would still have an advantage,
because it comes preinstalled, which is an unfair business
practice. This is where the browser choice comes in. Isn't it much
neater to let the customer choose which OS he wants to have by
having two Operating Systems preinstalled? It can't be done? Of
course it can! I once bought a laptop and could choose between
Windows 3.1 and Windows 95. I ran a dual boot system for four
years. Don't tell me it can't be done! It has been done."
Complete Story
Related Stories:
- Getting your Microsoft Tax Refunded: 10/10 for Amazon UK! [Updated](Jul 24, 2009)
- Linux, Mac users - your copy of Windows may be tax deductible(Jul 16, 2009)
- Ballmer says Windows 7 is vaporware(Jul 15, 2009)
- The Huge Hidden Cost of Microsoft Software(Jun 30, 2009)
- Microsoft charity crackdown spurs boycott(May 21, 2009)
- Experts: Windows 7 at risk from legacy flaw(May 07, 2009)
- Who Runs Dell(May 04, 2009)
- Proprietary Tax Makes Linux $1000 Less Expensive Than Mac, Windows(Apr 21, 2009)
- This is Why Lenovo Sucks at Linux(Apr 21, 2009)