The GNU/Linux Desktop and Borrowed Assumptions about Usability
Sep 04, 2009, 08:04 (0 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Bruce Byfield)
"Despite the emphasis that major distributions place upon
usability, nobody seems to ask the question about what definition
of usability is being assumed, or what kind of users that
definition produces. Or, whether those users will be capable of
reaching the free software goal of being able to control their own
computing.
"The conventional wisdom is that free software began by mostly
ignoring usability issues. It was software designed by geeks and
for geeks, and functionality was more important than ease of
use.
"Then, gradually, influenced by documents such as the GNOME
Human Interface Guidelines and the freedesktop.org standards, the
community became aware of the need to consider usability, and came
to rival the standards of proprietary software."
Complete
Story
Related Stories:
- Kubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala (Alpha 4) Overview & Screenshots(Aug 23, 2009)
- Debian: contempt for "end user" values has to stop!(Aug 13, 2009)
- Bjarne Stroustrup Expounds on Concepts and the Future of C++(Aug 08, 2009)
- Editor's Note: Happy Birthday to Me, Tech = Change, Change is Good(Aug 08, 2009)
- Forget Linux, We Need Fisher-Price Computers(Aug 05, 2009)
- Buying with the Penguin(Jul 28, 2009)
- Support the Linux Community Every Time You Shop(Jul 28, 2009)
- KDE's new Plasma netbook interface shines in small places(Jul 27, 2009)
- One Hundred Paper Cuts Round 2 Progress Report(Jul 23, 2009)
- Hams, hackers, hobbyists and model railways(Jul 22, 2009)
- Group test: Linux netbooks(Jul 17, 2009)
