Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:On “Custom XML” (and why nobody should care)
On “Custom XML” (and why nobody should care)
Dec 27, 2009, 04 :04 UTC (2 Talkback[s]) (5467 reads)

"Extensibility · The “X” in XML stands for “Extensible” and that’s because anybody can invent an XML language. You could post a chunk of text on the Internet like so:

X311-J

"And you wouldn’t have to ask anyone’s permission to use the terms “tool”, “tier”, or “frobnosticate”, because of the extensibility.

"Of course, doing that isn’t very useful. Most people who use XML work with handy pre-cooked sets of tags like RSS or Atom or XHTML or ODF or OOXML, and leave the extensibility to the people who do the pre-cooking for us. Most times, you never actually see the XML.

"History · But back the era of XML’s predecessor SGML, and even somewhat into the XML era, there was this vision that everyone should go out and invent new XML languages to meet their own particular business requirements. I think that these days, most people have come around to the view that you shouldn’t do that."

Complete Story

Related Stories:
The Relevancy of ODF 1.0(Dec 18, 2009)
Officeshots: making ODF truly interoperable(Dec 03, 2009)
Asking the right questions about Office 2010's OOXML support(Nov 23, 2009)
The Final OOXML Update: Part III(Nov 03, 2009)
An Amazing Coincidence or Something More Sinister?(Oct 23, 2009)
The Final OOXML Update: Part II(Oct 16, 2009)
Source Code Isn't A Standard(Oct 09, 2009)
The Final OOXML Update: Part I(Oct 07, 2009)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
MS has just driven another niche competi ...   And why you *should* care   
Charles Hixson
Dec 27, 2009, 18:49:12
 
As a Linux user I fit into your "Convert ...   NEVER TRUST MICROSOFT   
Robert Collard
Dec 28, 2009, 19:02:31
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP