Linux Today: Linux News On Internet Time.
Search Linux Today
Linux News Sections:  Blog -  Developer -  High Performance -  Infrastructure -  IT Management -  Security -  Storage -
Linux Today Navigation
LT Home
Preferences
Contribute
Link to Us
Search
Linux Jobs

Linux Today
Enterprise Linux Today
Apache Today
JustLinux.com
Linux Planet
PHPBuilder
All Linux Devices
Technology Jobs

JustTechJobs.com

LinuxToday Newsletters
Server Daily
IT Management Daily
Subscribe News
Subscribe PR
Subscribe Security

internet.com
Internet News
Small Business

Advertise
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

 






Current Newswire:

Want a Job? Learn Linux

PC-BSD 9 review – to FreeBSD what Ubuntu is to Debian

Time to dispel open source myths, says Liam Maxwell

SECURITY: Nmap Inside and Out

Eight features Windows 8 'borrowed' from Linux

Malware devs embrace open-source

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Raspberry Pi benchmarked against Beagleboard, low price is long term

20 popular Ubuntu Linux apps you may want to try

A Selection of the Very Best Open Source Tutorials and Tools



Applications Management Engineer Sr (NYC)
Next Step Systems
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume
:Copyright infringement - inside the legal minefield
Copyright infringement - inside the legal minefield
Mar 9, 2010, 23 :06 UTC (1 Talkback[s]) (2615 reads)

(Other stories by Pat Pilcher)

"Several weeks ago the Australian high court ruled in favour of Aussie ISP iiNet in a landmark legal battle where AFACT (Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft) argued that iiNet was as guilty as some of its subscribers of online copyright infringement.

"The ruling sent ripples through global intellectual property community and potentially has implications for New Zealand with local copyright infringement laws soon to be bedded down.

"AFCT have announced that it intends to appeal the ruling. To find out more on how and why this is happening, as well as what the possible legal implications are locally, I caught up with Rick Shera, an IT legal specialist, and partner at Lowndes Jordan

"What is the legal argument at the heart of the AFACT vs iiNet case?"

Complete Story

Related Stories:
SCALE 8x: Free software legal issues(Mar 05, 2010)
When traditional media want copyright for themselves, but violate others' copyright(Mar 05, 2010)
EFF: Unintended Consequences - Twelve Years Under the DMCA(Mar 04, 2010)
Open-Source Software: Bad, Evil and Un-American(Mar 04, 2010)
Senate Leader Blasts Tech Industry, Plans Net Freedom Law(Mar 03, 2010)
Updated: New Zealand seeks to restrain ACTA(Mar 02, 2010)
Get your damn hands off my Internet!(Mar 01, 2010)


Index Mode   |   Flat Mode   |   Thread Mode   |   Thread Flat  
  Talkback(s) Name  and Date
AFACT (and my extension the MPAA) are ca ...   No Due Process   
C. Whitman
Mar 10, 2010, 20:08:27
 
  Home | Search Talkbacks | Customize View    Top of Page  



Enter your comments below:

* Your Name:

* Your Email Address:

* Subject:

CC: [will also send this talkback to an E-Mail address]

* Comments:

Tags allowed:<I>,<B> and <U>. See our talkback-policy for more about talkback content.

Fields marked with * are required!

..............................




All times are recorded in UTC.
Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Powered by Linux, Apache and PHP