Copyright and wrong

"Parliament had given them rights, but it had set a time limit on them: 21 years for books already in print and 14 years for new ones, with an additional 14 years if the author was still alive when the first term ran out. After that, the material would enter the public domain so that anyone could reproduce it. The lawmakers intended thus to balance the incentive to create with the interest that society has in free access to knowledge and art. The Statute of Anne thus helped nurture and channel the spate of inventiveness that Enlightenment society and its successors have since enjoyed.

"Over the past 50 years, however, that balance has shifted. Largely thanks to the entertainment industry's lawyers and lobbyists, copyright's scope and duration have vastly increased. In America, copyright holders get 95 years' protection as a result of an extension granted in 1998, derided by critics as the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act". They are now calling for even greater protection, and there have been efforts to introduce similar terms in Europe. Such arguments should be resisted: it is time to tip the balance back."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Proprietary Licenses Are Even Worse Than They Look(Apr 08, 2010)
• An open letter to Victoria A. Espinel, US "IP Czar"(Apr 01, 2010)
• The importance of Document Freedom Day explained by Microsoft(Mar 31, 2010)
• 201001 acta.pdf as text (full text of leaked copy)(Mar 24, 2010)
• Making a copyright system that works(Mar 24, 2010)
• Google's privacy campaign, and three ways in which Google gets your data(Mar 23, 2010)
• Your life will some day end; ACTA will live on(Mar 22, 2010)
• 10 ways you might be breaking the law with your computer: UPDATED(Mar 12, 2010)
• All Hail Our Benevolent Corporate Overlords(Mar 10, 2010)