Why Governments Should Use Open Source Licensing

"Here's a wonderful cautionary tale:

"Systran created a specially adapted version of its Systran-Unix machine translation software for the [European] Commission, calling it EC-Systran Unix between 1997 and 2002.

"In 2003 the Commission published a call for tenders for work updating its machine translation systems. That call included demands that a company conduct "enhancements, adaptations and additions to linguistic routines … specific improvements to analysis, transfer and synthesis programs ... [and] system updates", according to a statement from the General Court.

"Systran told the Commission that the work the Commission was asking for tenders for would infringe the copyright in Systran's software."

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Patents do not protect small firms, says trade body(Dec 18, 2010)
• Editor's Note: If I Wanted to Be Naked I'd Be Naked(Dec 17, 2010)
• Commerce Dept. Calls for Privacy Bill of Rights(Dec 17, 2010)
• Is 2011 the year of open source in the public sector?(Dec 16, 2010)
• EFF Location Privacy Victory at Third Circuit Stands, With Implications Far Beyond Your Cell Phone(Dec 16, 2010)
• OpenBSD/FBI allegations denied by named participants(Dec 15, 2010)
• Breaking News on EFF Victory: Appeals Court Holds that Email Privacy Protected by Fourth Amendment(Dec 15, 2010)