Sony v. Hotz: Sony Sends A Dangerous Message to Researchers -- and Its Customers

"For years, EFF has been warning that the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act can be used to chill speech, particularly security research, because legitimate researchers will be afraid to publish their results lest they be accused of circumventing a technological protection measure. We've also been concerned that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act could be abused to try to make alleged contract violations into crimes.

"We've never been sorrier to be right. These two things are precisely what's happening in Sony v. Hotz. If you have missed this one, Sony has sued several security researchers for publishing information about security holes in Sony's PlayStation 3. At first glance, it's hard to see why Sony is bothering — after all, the research was presented three weeks ago at the Chaos Communication Congress and promptly circulated around the world. The security flaws discovered by the researchers allow users to run Linux on their machines again — something Sony used to support but recently started trying to prevent. Paying lawyers to try to put the cat back in the bag is just throwing good money after bad. And even if they won — we'll save the legal analysis for another post — the defendants seem unlikely to be able to pay significant damages. So what's the point?"

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Sony Files Exhibits Trying to Link Hotz to California - Updated - A Supplemental Brief(Jan 19, 2011)
• Sony v. Hotz Begins - Updated 2Xs: Hotz Responds(Jan 17, 2011)
• Today�s Award for the Silliest Theory of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act(Jan 14, 2011)
• PlayStation 3 hack – how it happened and what it means(Jan 09, 2011)
• Sony finally responds to Fail0verflow PS3 “root key” hack(Jan 08, 2011)