What's next after GPL and Apache?

At the end of April, I wrote about the idea that usage of the GNU General Public License (GPL) is declining and concluded that although new, commercially initiated open source projects were indeed tending to adopt other licenses, the use of the GPL itself is still growing -- especially among projects in its core community of GNU platform development. This article explores why commercial projects pick particular open source licenses and what might happen in the future.

First, a brief historical recap: During the "open source bubble" of the mid-2000s, driven to build Web-facing solutions on short timescales, many companies used a combination of Linux/Apache HTTPD/MySQL/Perl to prototype and iterate. They were able to do this because open source specifically grants the freedom to use those packages for any purpose -- to study them, modify them, and deploy them -- all without permission from any entity.

Complete Story

Related Stories:

• Everything2.com: A Hybrid BSD/GPL License(Nov 05, 2003)
• InformationWeek: New GPL License Is Coming: Linus Torvalds Wishes It Weren't(Mar 14, 2007)
• BULMA: Why must we adopt the GPL license?(Aug 24, 2001)
• InfoWorld: Sun Considers GPL License for Solaris(May 01, 2004)
• Daemon News: Restrictively Unrestrictive: The GPL License in Software Development(May 02, 1999)