Fixing Polls: An Open Letter to MSNBC.comSep 16, 2000, 18:36 (137 Talkback[s])
(Other stories by Kevin Reichard)
This letter was sent to the management of MSNBC. In light of the blatant poll-fixing at MSNBC, I would suggest you do the same. The letter was sent to email@example.com, TechNews@MSNBC.com, World@MSNBC.com, and Nightly@NBC.com. --Kevin Reichard
At least we were open about asking our readers to vote for Linux, but to rig an online poll is something that MSNBC should worry about: someone with a pro-Microsoft agenda is clearly unleashing a bot to manipulate the results of the online poll. As an impartial news-gathering organization, you have a responsbility to present an unbiased forum. It strains creduility that 50,000 votes were tallied SOLELY for Microsoft 2000/ME on a Saturday morning.
As you know, Microsoft has a track record of rigging online polls; those attempts have been well-documented at Linux Today and other Web sites. I actually expected more from MSNBC. It also casts a pall on the credibility of NBC; getting into bed with Microsoft probably was a bad move, but for NBC to allow Microsoft to alter the news when it is not flattering to Microsoft is truly saddening.
As one of our readers pointed out:
> > Something is wrong with the poll.
Someone is definitively 'fixing' this poll. We've had a total of nearly 30,000 votes in 2 days. This morning, in a few hours we're reached almost 80,000 votes. Initially this surge was almost 100% in favor of NT/W2K which had at some point 48% of the total. Now the vote is being distributed to every OS but Linux. I'm amazed by the scale of this manipulation. I guess we should have seen it coming.
And as another reader pointed out:
How can it be?
Four hours ago I looked, and linux had 38% of around 37000 votes and Windows NT had only 19%.
Now 4 hours later there are almost 100,000 votes and Linux is in last place. For two days the voting had been slow and all of a sudden Windows votes sky rocket. There is definitively someone manufacturing the percentages!
0 Talkback[s] (click to add your comment)